mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TMoE-P: Towards the Pareto Optimum for Multivariate Soft Sensors

arXiv 2302.10477 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2023cs.AI stat.APcited by 0

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE theory and gating functions

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-variate soft sensor seeks accurate estimation of multiple quality variables using measurable process variables, which have emerged as a key factor in improving the quality of industrial manufacturing. The current progress stays in some direct applications of multitask network architectures; however, there are two fundamental issues remain yet to be investigated with these approaches: (1) negative transfer, where sharing representations despite the difference of discriminate representations for different objectives degrades performance; (2) seesaw phenomenon, where the optimizer focuses on one dominant yet simple objective at the expense of others. In this study, we reformulate the multi-variate soft sensor to a multi-objective problem, to address both issues and advance state-of-the-art performance. To handle the negative transfer issue, we first propose an Objective-aware Mixture-of-Experts (OMoE) module, utilizing objective-specific and objective-shared experts for parameter sharing while maintaining the distinction between objectives. To address the seesaw phenomenon, we then propose a Pareto Objective Routing (POR) module, adjusting the weights of learning objectives dynamically to achieve the Pareto optimum, with solid theoretical supports. We further present a Task-aware Mixture-of-Experts framework for achieving the Pareto optimum (TMoE-P) in multi-variate soft sensor, which consists of a stacked OMoE module and a POR module. We illustrate the efficacy of TMoE-P with an open soft sensor benchmark, where TMoE-P effectively alleviates the negative transfer and seesaw issues and outperforms the baseline models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE theory and gating functions, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 7 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2023.

Builds on

7 of 44 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
  2. 2016Cross-stitch Networks for Multi-task Learningcited by 467
  3. 2016UberNet: Training a `Universal' Convolutional Neural Network for Low-, Mid-, and High-Level Vision using Diverse Datasets and Limited Memorycited by 200
  4. 2022ESCM2: Entire Space Counterfactual Multi-Task Model for Post-Click Conversion Rate Estimationcited by 47
  5. 2019Stochastic Filter Groups for Multi-Task CNNs: Learning Specialist and Generalist Convolution Kernelscited by 42
  6. 2017Latent Multi-task Architecture Learningcited by 29
  7. 2021GraSSNet: Graph Soft Sensing Neural Networkscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Modeling Task Relationships in Multi-variate Soft Sensor with Balanced Mixture-of-Experts
  2. 2025A Soft Sensor Method with Uncertainty-Awareness and Self-Explanation Based on Large Language Models Enhanced by Domain Knowledge Retrieval
  3. 2024Machine learning for industrial sensing and control: A survey and practical perspective
  4. 2026ParetoPilot: Zero-Surrogate Offline Multi-Objective Optimization via Infer-Perturb-Guide Diffusion
  5. 2026Pareto-Conditioned Diffusion Models for Offline Multi-Objective Optimization
  6. 2024ParetoFlow: Guided Flows in Multi-Objective Optimization
  7. 2025Optimizing Predictive Maintenance in Intelligent Manufacturing: An Integrated FNO-DAE-GNN-PPO MDP Framework
  8. 2024Pareto Data Framework: Steps Towards Resource-Efficient Decision Making Using Minimum Viable Data (MVD)