Interpretable Out-Of-Distribution Detection Using Pattern Identification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Out-of-distribution (OoD) detection for data-based programs is a goal of paramount importance. Common approaches in the literature tend to train detectors requiring inside-of-distribution (in-distribution, or IoD) and OoD validation samples, and/or implement confidence metrics that are often abstract and therefore difficult to interpret. In this work, we propose to use existing work from the field of explainable AI, namely the PARTICUL pattern identification algorithm, in order to build more interpretable and robust OoD detectors for visual classifiers. Crucially, this approach does not require to retrain the classifier and is tuned directly to the IoD dataset, making it applicable to domains where OoD does not have a clear definition. Moreover, pattern identification allows us to provide images from the IoD dataset as reference points to better explain the confidence scores. We demonstrates that the detection capabilities of this approach are on par with existing methods through an extensive benchmark across four datasets and two definitions of OoD. In particular, we introduce a new benchmark based on perturbations of the IoD dataset which provides a known and quantifiable evaluation of the discrepancy between the IoD and OoD datasets that serves as a reference value for the comparison between various OoD detection methods. Our experiments show that the robustness of all metrics under test does not solely depend on the nature of the IoD dataset or the OoD definition, but also on the architecture of the classifier, which stresses the need for thorough experimentations for future work on OoD detection.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2023.
Builds on
22 of 33 references.
References · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
- 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
- 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
10 more
- 2022OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 267
- 2015A Large-Scale Car Dataset for Fine-Grained Categorization and Verificationcited by 129
- 2017Object-Part Attention Model for Fine-grained Image Classificationcited by 54
- 2020Feature Space Singularity for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 49
- 2020Confidence Estimation via Auxiliary Modelscited by 33
- 2021No True State-of-the-Art? OOD Detection Methods are Inconsistent across Datasetscited by 31
- 2019Attribute-Aware Attention Model for Fine-grained Representation Learningcited by 22
- 2020Attribute Mix: Semantic Data Augmentation for Fine Grained Recognitioncited by 15
- 2019Recognizing Part Attributes with Insufficient Datacited by 12
- 2022PARTICUL: Part Identification with Confidence measure using Unsupervised Learningcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.