mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Active Learning in Brain Tumor Segmentation with Uncertainty Sampling, Annotation Redundancy Restriction, and Data Initialization

arXiv 2302.10185 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2023cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models have demonstrated great potential in medical 3D imaging, but their development is limited by the expensive, large volume of annotated data required. Active learning (AL) addresses this by training a model on a subset of the most informative data samples without compromising performance. We compared different AL strategies and propose a framework that minimizes the amount of data needed for state-of-the-art performance. 638 multi-institutional brain tumor MRI images were used to train a 3D U-net model and compare AL strategies. We investigated uncertainty sampling, annotation redundancy restriction, and initial dataset selection techniques. Uncertainty estimation techniques including Bayesian estimation with dropout, bootstrapping, and margins sampling were compared to random query. Strategies to avoid annotation redundancy by removing similar images within the to-be-annotated subset were considered as well. We determined the minimum amount of data necessary to achieve similar performance to the model trained on the full dataset (α = 0.1). A variance-based selection strategy using radiomics to identify the initial training dataset is also proposed. Bayesian approximation with dropout at training and testing showed similar results to that of the full data model with less than 20% of the training data (p=0.293) compared to random query achieving similar performance at 56.5% of the training data (p=0.814). Annotation redundancy restriction techniques achieved state-of-the-art performance at approximately 40%-50% of the training data. Radiomics dataset initialization had higher Dice with initial dataset sizes of 20 and 80 images, but improvements were not significant. In conclusion, we investigated various AL strategies with dropout uncertainty estimation achieving state-of-the-art performance with the least annotated data.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2023.

Builds on

10 of 23 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  4. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 508
  5. 2017Cost-Effective Active Learning for Deep Image Classificationcited by 165
  6. 2019A Survey on Active Learning and Human-in-the-Loop Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 150
  7. 2017Suggestive Annotation: A Deep Active Learning Framework for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 145
  8. 2018Efficient Active Learning for Image Classification and Segmentation using a Sample Selection and Conditional Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 74
  9. 2020Self-Loop Uncertainty: A Novel Pseudo-Label for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentationcited by 42
  10. 2020Confident Coreset for Active Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3.

4 papers.