mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AutoDOViz: Human-Centered Automation for Decision Optimization

arXiv 2302.09688 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2023cs.HC cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present AutoDOViz, an interactive user interface for automated decision optimization (AutoDO) using reinforcement learning (RL). Decision optimization (DO) has classically being practiced by dedicated DO researchers where experts need to spend long periods of time fine tuning a solution through trial-and-error. AutoML pipeline search has sought to make it easier for a data scientist to find the best machine learning pipeline by leveraging automation to search and tune the solution. More recently, these advances have been applied to the domain of AutoDO, with a similar goal to find the best reinforcement learning pipeline through algorithm selection and parameter tuning. However, Decision Optimization requires significantly more complex problem specification when compared to an ML problem. AutoDOViz seeks to lower the barrier of entry for data scientists in problem specification for reinforcement learning problems, leverage the benefits of AutoDO algorithms for RL pipeline search and finally, create visualizations and policy insights in order to facilitate the typical interactive nature when communicating problem formulation and solution proposals between DO experts and domain experts. In this paper, we report our findings from semi-structured expert interviews with DO practitioners as well as business consultants, leading to design requirements for human-centered automation for DO with RL. We evaluate a system implementation with data scientists and find that they are significantly more open to engage in DO after using our proposed solution. AutoDOViz further increases trust in RL agent models and makes the automated training and evaluation process more comprehensible. As shown for other automation in ML tasks, we also conclude automation of RL for DO can benefit from user and vice-versa when the interface promotes human-in-the-loop.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2023.

Builds on

25 of 66 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  2. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overviewcited by 327
  3. 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 237
  4. 2018Auto-Keras: An Efficient Neural Architecture Search Systemcited by 169
  5. 2017Visualizing and Understanding Atari Agentscited by 141
  6. 2020Explainable Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 139
  7. 2018Visual Analytics in Deep Learning: An Interrogative Survey for the Next Frontierscited by 117
  8. 2019Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists' Perceptions of Automated AIcited by 79
  9. 2016Evaluation of a Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool for Automating Data Sciencecited by 73
  10. 2016Graying the black box: Understanding DQNscited by 68
  11. 2020A Survey of Visual Analytics Techniques for Machine Learningcited by 56
  12. 2017One button machine for automating feature engineering in relational databasescited by 32
13 more
  1. 2022The State of the Art in Enhancing Trust in Machine Learning Models with the Use of Visualizationscited by 29
  2. 2020A Survey on ML4VIS: Applying Machine Learning Advances to Data Visualizationcited by 28
  3. 2019AutoAIViz: Opening the Blackbox of Automated Artificial Intelligence with Conditional Parallel Coordinatescited by 24
  4. 2019ATMSeer: Increasing Transparency and Controllability in Automated Machine Learningcited by 23
  5. 2020Amazon SageMaker Autopilot: a white box AutoML solution at scalecited by 20
  6. 2021Why? Why not? When? Visual Explanations of Agent Behavior in Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  7. 2019Optimization Problems for Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 15
  8. 2021AutoAI-TS: AutoAI for Time Series Forecastingcited by 15
  9. 2019DRLViz: Understanding Decisions and Memory in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  10. 2016A Sparse Stress Modelcited by 6
  11. 2021Contrastive Explanations for Comparing Preferences of Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 5
  12. 2019Conditional Parallel Coordinatescited by 3
  13. 2022Boolean Decision Rules for Reinforcement Learning Policy Summarisationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.