Optimising Human-Machine Collaboration for Efficient High-Precision Information Extraction from Text Documents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While humans can extract information from unstructured text with high precision and recall, this is often too time-consuming to be practical. Automated approaches, on the other hand, produce nearly-immediate results, but may not be reliable enough for high-stakes applications where precision is essential. In this work, we consider the benefits and drawbacks of various human-only, human-machine, and machine-only information extraction approaches. We argue for the utility of a human-in-the-loop approach in applications where high precision is required, but purely manual extraction is infeasible. We present a framework and an accompanying tool for information extraction using weak-supervision labelling with human validation. We demonstrate our approach on three criminal justice datasets. We find that the combination of computer speed and human understanding yields precision comparable to manual annotation while requiring only a fraction of time, and significantly outperforms fully automated baselines in terms of precision.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2023.
Builds on
29 of 92 references.
References · 29
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
- 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
17 more
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
- 2019LayoutLM: Pre-training of Text and Layout for Document Image Understandingcited by 549
- 2019Benchmarking Zero-shot Text Classification: Datasets, Evaluation and Entailment Approachcited by 299
- 2022Large Language Models are Few-Shot Clinical Information Extractorscited by 206
- 2020Reward-rational (implicit) choice: A unifying formalism for reward learningcited by 119
- 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
- 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
- 2022Human-AI Collaboration via Conditional Delegation: A Case Study of Content Moderationcited by 66
- 2018The age of secrecy and unfairness in recidivism predictioncited by 53
- 2020Interactive Weak Supervision: Learning Useful Heuristics for Data Labelingcited by 52
- 2022A Taxonomy of Human and ML Strengths in Decision-Making to Investigate Human-ML Complementaritycited by 22
- 2021Increasing the Speed and Accuracy of Data LabelingThrough an AI Assisted Interfacecited by 21
- 2021LightTag: Text Annotation Platformcited by 16
- 2021Active WeaSuL: Improving Weak Supervision with Active Learningcited by 12
- 2019Discovering the Sweet Spot of Human-Computer Configurations: A Case Study in Information Extractioncited by 11
- 2021Supporting Serendipity: Opportunities and Challenges for Human-AI Collaboration in Qualitative Analysiscited by 11
- 2022Can We Automate the Analysis of Online Child Sexual Exploitation Discourse?cited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Refining Labeling Functions with Limited Labeled Datacited by 1
- 2025Refining Labeling Functions with Limited Labeled Data29 May 2025