mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Point Cloud Registration for LiDAR and Photogrammetric Data: a Critical Synthesis and Performance Analysis on Classic and Deep Learning Algorithms

arXiv 2302.07184 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2023cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in computer vision and deep learning have shown promising performance in estimating rigid/similarity transformation between unregistered point clouds of complex objects and scenes. However, their performances are mostly evaluated using a limited number of datasets from a single sensor (e.g. Kinect or RealSense cameras), lacking a comprehensive overview of their applicability in photogrammetric 3D mapping scenarios. In this work, we provide a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art (SOTA) point cloud registration methods, where we analyze and evaluate these methods using a diverse set of point cloud data from indoor to satellite sources. The quantitative analysis allows for exploring the strengths, applicability, challenges, and future trends of these methods. In contrast to existing analysis works that introduce point cloud registration as a holistic process, our experimental analysis is based on its inherent two-step process to better comprehend these approaches including feature/keypoint-based initial coarse registration and dense fine registration through cloud-to-cloud (C2C) optimization. More than ten methods, including classic hand-crafted, deep-learning-based feature correspondence, and robust C2C methods were tested. We observed that the success rate of most of the algorithms are fewer than 40% over the datasets we tested and there are still are large margin of improvement upon existing algorithms concerning 3D sparse corresopondence search, and the ability to register point clouds with complex geometry and occlusions. With the evaluated statistics on three datasets, we conclude the best-performing methods for each step and provide our recommendations, and outlook future efforts.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 101 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2023.

Builds on

32 of 101 references.

References · 32

  1. 20163DMatch: Learning Local Geometric Descriptors from RGB-D Reconstructionscited by 333
  2. 2020PREDATOR: Registration of 3D Point Clouds with Low Overlapcited by 287
  3. 2020TEASER: Fast and Certifiable Point Cloud Registrationcited by 274
  4. 2020Deep Global Registrationcited by 228
  5. 2022Geometric Transformer for Fast and Robust Point Cloud Registrationcited by 200
  6. 2020D3Feat: Joint Learning of Dense Detection and Description of 3D Local Featurescited by 175
  7. 2021PointDSC: Robust Point Cloud Registration using Deep Spatial Consistencycited by 142
  8. 2020SpinNet: Learning a General Surface Descriptor for 3D Point Cloud Registrationcited by 141
  9. 2017Graph-Cut RANSACcited by 133
  10. 2022KISS-ICP: In Defense of Point-to-Point ICP -- Simple, Accurate, and Robust Registration If Done the Right Waycited by 132
  11. 2019Graduated Non-Convexity for Robust Spatial Perception: From Non-Minimal Solvers to Global Outlier Rejectioncited by 92
  12. 2020DeepGMR: Learning Latent Gaussian Mixture Models for Registrationcited by 91
20 more
  1. 2019USIP: Unsupervised Stable Interest Point Detection from 3D Point Cloudscited by 70
  2. 2021You Only Hypothesize Once: Point Cloud Registration with Rotation-equivariant Descriptorscited by 68
  3. 2020Fast and Robust Iterative Closest Pointcited by 67
  4. 2017Guaranteed Outlier Removal for Point Cloud Registration with Correspondencescited by 62
  5. 2021Deep Hough Voting for Robust Global Registrationcited by 53
  6. 2018FilterReg: Robust and Efficient Probabilistic Point-Set Registration using Gaussian Filter and Twist Parameterizationcited by 43
  7. 2019A Polynomial-time Solution for Robust Registration with Extreme Outlier Ratescited by 38
  8. 2020ROBIN: a Graph-Theoretic Approach to Reject Outliers in Robust Estimation using Invariantscited by 38
  9. 2013Rotational Projection Statistics for 3D Local Surface Description and Object Recognitioncited by 36
  10. 2020PointGMM: a Neural GMM Network for Point Cloudscited by 33
  11. 2018Robust Fitting in Computer Vision: Easy or Hard?cited by 25
  12. 2018Convex Relaxations for Pose Graph Optimization with Outlierscited by 19
  13. 2018Practical optimal registration of terrestrial LiDAR scan pairscited by 16
  14. 2017Globally-Optimal Inlier Set Maximisation for Simultaneous Camera Pose and Feature Correspondencecited by 11
  15. 2021LSG-CPD: Coherent Point Drift with Local Surface Geometry for Point Cloud Registrationcited by 11
  16. 2019Outlier-Robust Spatial Perception: Hardness, General-Purpose Algorithms, and Guaranteescited by 10
  17. 2019A Performance Evaluation of Correspondence Grouping Methods for 3D Rigid Data Matchingcited by 10
  18. 2019Consensus Maximization Tree Search Revisitedcited by 10
  19. 2021A Robust Loss for Point Cloud Registrationcited by 8
  20. 2017In search of inliers: 3d correspondence by local and global votingcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.