mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Delay Sensitive Hierarchical Federated Learning with Stochastic Local Updates

arXiv 2302.04851 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2023cs.IT cs.LG cs.NIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The impact of local averaging on the performance of federated learning (FL) systems is studied in the presence of communication delay between the clients and the parameter server. To minimize the effect of delay, clients are assigned into different groups, each having its own local parameter server (LPS) that aggregates its clients' models. The groups' models are then aggregated at a global parameter server (GPS) that only communicates with the LPSs. Such setting is known as hierarchical FL (HFL). Unlike most works in the literature, the number of local and global communication rounds in our work is randomly determined by the (different) delays experienced by each group of clients. Specifically, the number of local averaging rounds is tied to a wall-clock time period coined the sync time S, after which the LPSs synchronize their models by sharing them with the GPS. Such sync time S is then reapplied until a global wall-clock time is exhausted. First, an upper bound on the deviation between the updated model at each LPS with respect to that available at the GPS is derived. This is then used as a tool to derive the convergence analysis of our proposed delay-sensitive HFL algorithm, first at each LPS individually, and then at the GPS. Our theoretical convergence bound showcases the effects of the whole system's parameters, including the number of groups, the number of clients per group, and the value of S. Our results show that the value of S should be carefully chosen, especially since it implicitly governs how the delay statistics affect the performance of HFL in situations where training time is restricted.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2023.

Builds on

18 of 24 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
  3. 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 897
  4. 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 595
  5. 2019Robust and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning from Non-IID Datacited by 415
  6. 2020FedML: A Research Library and Benchmark for Federated Machine Learningcited by 298
  7. 2018Parallel Restarted SGD with Faster Convergence and Less Communication: Demystifying Why Model Averaging Works for Deep Learningcited by 277
  8. 2019Client-Edge-Cloud Hierarchical Federated Learningcited by 202
  9. 2018Don't Use Large Mini-Batches, Use Local SGDcited by 201
  10. 2020Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?cited by 151
  11. 2020HFEL: Joint Edge Association and Resource Allocation for Cost-Efficient Hierarchical Federated Edge Learningcited by 74
  12. 2022FedVARP: Tackling the Variance Due to Partial Client Participation in Federated Learningcited by 62
6 more
  1. 2022A Unified Analysis of Federated Learning with Arbitrary Client Participationcited by 45
  2. 2019Age-Based Scheduling Policy for Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networkscited by 39
  3. 2020Demystifying Why Local Aggregation Helps: Convergence Analysis of Hierarchical SGDcited by 26
  4. 2022Wireless Quantized Federated Learning: A Joint Computation and Communication Designcited by 15
  5. 2020Enhancing Privacy via Hierarchical Federated Learningcited by 10
  6. 2020Timely Communication in Federated Learningcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

8 papers.