mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Sampling with Approximate Transport Maps

arXiv 2302.04763 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transport maps can ease the sampling of distributions with non-trivial geometries by transforming them into distributions that are easier to handle. The potential of this approach has risen with the development of Normalizing Flows (NF) which are maps parameterized with deep neural networks trained to push a reference distribution towards a target. NF-enhanced samplers recently proposed blend (Markov chain) Monte Carlo methods with either (i) proposal draws from the flow or (ii) a flow-based reparametrization. In both cases, the quality of the learned transport conditions performance. The present work clarifies for the first time the relative strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches. Our study concludes that multimodal targets can be reliably handled with flow-based proposals up to moderately high dimensions. In contrast, methods relying on reparametrization struggle with multimodality but are more robust otherwise in high-dimensional settings and under poor training. To further illustrate the influence of target-proposal adequacy, we also derive a new quantitative bound for the mixing time of the Independent Metropolis-Hastings sampler.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2023.

Builds on

34 of 83 references.

References · 34

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  3. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  4. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
  5. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
  6. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 680
  7. 2018Pyro: Deep Universal Probabilistic Programmingcited by 379
  8. 2019Residual Flows for Invertible Generative Modelingcited by 256
  9. 2018Neural Importance Samplingcited by 154
  10. 2019Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theorycited by 147
  11. 2022Flow Annealed Importance Sampling Bootstrapcited by 124
  12. 2018Log-concave sampling: Metropolis-Hastings algorithms are fastcited by 117
22 more
  1. 2021Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlocited by 90
  2. 2019Semi-Supervised Learning with Normalizing Flowscited by 76
  3. 2019NeuTra-lizing Bad Geometry in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Using Neural Transportcited by 73
  4. 2020Your GAN is Secretly an Energy-based Model and You Should use Discriminator Driven Latent Samplingcited by 71
  5. 2020Targeted free energy estimation via learned mappingscited by 66
  6. 2020Optimal dimension dependence of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 57
  7. 2019Fast mixing of Metropolized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo: Benefits of multi-step gradientscited by 51
  8. 2021Minimax Mixing Time of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm for Log-Concave Samplingcited by 44
  9. 2022Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermionscited by 30
  10. 2021Variational Refinement for Importance Sampling Using the Forward Kullback-Leibler Divergencecited by 29
  11. 2022Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCDcited by 26
  12. 2020MCMC Should Mix: Learning Energy-Based Model with Neural Transport Latent Space MCMCcited by 25
  13. 2021Flow-based sampling for multimodal and extended-mode distributions in lattice field theorycited by 25
  14. 2021Local-Global MCMC kernels: the best of both worldscited by 21
  15. 2022Transport Elliptical Slice Samplingcited by 12
  16. 2021Machine Learning of Thermodynamic Observables in the Presence of Mode Collapsecited by 10
  17. 2022Deterministic Langevin Monte Carlo with Normalizing Flows for Bayesian Inferencecited by 10
  18. 2020Convergence of Gibbs Sampling: Coordinate Hit-and-Run Mixes Fastcited by 9
  19. 2019Normalizing Constant Estimation with Gaussianized Bridge Samplingcited by 6
  20. 2019Sampling for Bayesian Mixture Models: MCMC with Polynomial-Time Mixingcited by 5
  21. 2020On the mixing time of coordinate Hit-and-Runcited by 5
  22. 2021Geometric convergence of elliptical slice samplingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 11; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Iterated Denoising Energy Matching for Sampling from Boltzmann Densitiescited by 113
  2. 2024Stochastic Localization via Iterative Posterior Samplingcited by 27
  3. 2024Markovian Flow Matching: Accelerating MCMC with Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 9
  4. 2024Learned Reference-based Diffusion Sampling for multi-modal distributionscited by 9
  5. 2025Improving the evaluation of samplers on multi-modal targetscited by 9
  6. 2023Balanced Training of Energy-Based Models with Adaptive Flow Samplingcited by 4
  7. 2023Self-Tuning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Accelerated Samplingcited by 4
  8. 2024Amortized Bayesian Workflowcited by 3
  9. 2024Combining Normalizing Flows and Quasi-Monte Carlocited by 2
  10. 2024Parallel Affine Transformation Tuning of Markov Chain Monte Carlocited by 2
  11. 2026Convergence Rates for Distribution Matching with Sliced Optimal Transportcited by 2
  12. 2024Sequential transport maps using SoS density estimation and α-divergencescited by 1
8 more
  1. 2024Fast Bayesian Inference for Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions at Dark Matter Direct Detection Experimentscited by 1
  2. 2024Empirical evaluation of normalizing flows in Markov Chain Monte Carlocited by 1
  3. 2025Sampling by averaging: A multiscale approach to score estimationcited by 1
  4. 2026Latent-IMH: Efficient Bayesian Inference for Inverse Problems with Approximate Operatorscited by 1
  5. 2024MCMC-driven learningcited by 0
  6. 2025Reducing normalizing flow complexity for MCMC preconditioningcited by 0
  7. 2026Entropic Mirror Monte Carlocited by 0
  8. 2026Neural Transport Nested Samplingcited by 0