mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Offline Learning of Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation Controllers for Parkinson Disease Treatment

arXiv 2302.02477 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2023cs.LG eess.SP q-bio.QMcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown great promise toward treating motor symptoms caused by Parkinson's disease (PD), by delivering electrical pulses to the Basal Ganglia (BG) region of the brain. However, DBS devices approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can only deliver continuous DBS (cDBS) stimuli at a fixed amplitude; this energy inefficient operation reduces battery lifetime of the device, cannot adapt treatment dynamically for activity, and may cause significant side-effects (e.g., gait impairment). In this work, we introduce an offline reinforcement learning (RL) framework, allowing the use of past clinical data to train an RL policy to adjust the stimulation amplitude in real time, with the goal of reducing energy use while maintaining the same level of treatment (i.e., control) efficacy as cDBS. Moreover, clinical protocols require the safety and performance of such RL controllers to be demonstrated ahead of deployments in patients. Thus, we also introduce an offline policy evaluation (OPE) method to estimate the performance of RL policies using historical data, before deploying them on patients. We evaluated our framework on four PD patients equipped with the RC+S DBS system, employing the RL controllers during monthly clinical visits, with the overall control efficacy evaluated by severity of symptoms (i.e., bradykinesia and tremor), changes in PD biomakers (i.e., local field potentials), and patient ratings. The results from clinical experiments show that our RL-based controller maintains the same level of control efficacy as cDBS, but with significantly reduced stimulation energy. Further, the OPE method is shown effective in accurately estimating and ranking the expected returns of RL controllers.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2023.

Builds on

21 of 68 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  4. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  5. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  6. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  7. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
  8. 2015Policy Distillationcited by 414
  9. 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulation with Asynchronous Off-Policy Updatescited by 342
  10. 2015Doubly Robust Off-policy Value Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
  11. 2016Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
  12. 2019DualDICE: Behavior-Agnostic Estimation of Discounted Stationary Distribution Correctionscited by 254
9 more
  1. 2019Stochastic Latent Actor-Critic: Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Latent Variable Modelcited by 228
  2. 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 226
  3. 2017Scalable trust-region method for deep reinforcement learning using Kronecker-factored approximationcited by 119
  4. 2021Benchmarks for Deep Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 89
  5. 2020Off-Policy Evaluation via the Regularized Lagrangiancited by 86
  6. 2020CoinDICE: Off-Policy Confidence Interval Estimationcited by 64
  7. 2019Doubly Robust Bias Reduction in Infinite Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 48
  8. 2021Gradient Importance Learning for Incomplete Observationscited by 7
  9. 2023Variational Latent Branching Model for Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Temporal Basis Function Models for Closed-Loop Neural Stimulation
  2. 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning for Safer Blood Glucose Control in People with Type 1 Diabetes
  3. 2023Deep Offline Reinforcement Learning for Real-world Treatment Optimization Applications
  4. 2026Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Interpretable Keystroke Biomarkers in Parkinson's Disease
  5. 2026Confounding Masquerading as Improvement: A Systematic Evaluation of Offline Reinforcement Learning for Stroke Antithrombotic Treatment in a 129,000-Patient Registry
  6. 2021Model Selection for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Practical Considerations for Healthcare Settings
  7. 2024Reinforcement Learning in Dynamic Treatment Regimes Needs Critical Reexamination
  8. 2023End-to-end Offline Reinforcement Learning for Glycemia Control