SPARLING: Learning Latent Representations with Extremely Sparse Activations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Real-world processes often contain intermediate state that can be modeled as an extremely sparse activation tensor. In this work, we analyze the identifiability of such sparse and local latent intermediate variables, which we call motifs. We prove our Motif Identifiability Theorem, stating that under certain assumptions it is possible to precisely identify these motifs exclusively by reducing end-to-end error. Notably, we do not assume identifiability of parameters, but rather of a latent intermediate representation output by a local model, thus allowing these representations to be arbitrarily complex functions of the input. Additionally, we provide the Sparling algorithm, which uses a new kind of informational bottleneck that enforces levels of activation sparsity unachievable using other techniques. We confirm empirically that extreme sparsity is necessary to achieve good intermediate state modeling. On synthetic domains, we are able to precisely localize the intermediate states up to feature permutation with > 90% accuracy, even though we only train end-to-end.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2023.
Builds on
26 of 46 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
- 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 494
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
- 2014Recurrent Models of Visual Attentioncited by 344
- 2016Ladder Variational Autoencoderscited by 315
- 2022Language in a Bottle: Language Model Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 310
- 2016Grad-CAM: Why did you say that?cited by 159
14 more
- 2021Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity Regularization: A New Principle for Nonlinear ICAcited by 158
- 2017Recovery Guarantees for One-hidden-layer Neural Networkscited by 94
- 2016Group Sparse Regularization for Deep Neural Networkscited by 89
- 2022On the Identifiability of Nonlinear ICA: Sparsity and Beyondcited by 84
- 2019LassoNet: A Neural Network with Feature Sparsitycited by 81
- 2022Weakly Supervised Representation Learning with Sparse Perturbationscited by 64
- 2022Concept Embedding Models: Beyond the Accuracy-Explainability Trade-Offcited by 61
- 2021Have We Learned to Explain?: How Interpretability Methods Can Learn to Encode Predictions in their Interpretationscited by 59
- 2021Identifiable Deep Generative Models via Sparse Decodingcited by 54
- 2022Synergies between Disentanglement and Sparsity: Generalization and Identifiability in Multi-Task Learningcited by 44
- 2022Sparse Interaction Additive Networks via Feature Interaction Detection and Sparse Selectioncited by 28
- 2021Parameter identifiability of a deep feedforward ReLU neural networkcited by 24
- 2016Cross-Modal Scene Networkscited by 16
- 2019Sparsely Activated Networkscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.