mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fixed-kinetic Neural Hamiltonian Flows for enhanced interpretability and reduced complexity

arXiv 2302.01955 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Normalizing Flows (NF) are Generative models which transform a simple prior distribution into the desired target. They however require the design of an invertible mapping whose Jacobian determinant has to be computable. Recently introduced, Neural Hamiltonian Flows (NHF) are Hamiltonian dynamics-based flows, which are continuous, volume-preserving and invertible and thus make for natural candidates for robust NF architectures. In particular, their similarity to classical Mechanics could lead to easier interpretability of the learned mapping. In this paper, we show that the current NHF architecture may still pose a challenge to interpretability. Inspired by Physics, we introduce a fixed-kinetic energy version of the model. This approach improves interpretability and robustness while requiring fewer parameters than the original model. We illustrate that on a 2D Gaussian mixture and on the MNIST and Fashion-MNIST datasets. Finally, we show how to adapt NHF to the context of Bayesian inference and illustrate the method on an example from cosmology.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2023.

Builds on

28 of 61 references.

References · 28

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,005
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  6. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  7. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  8. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  9. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  10. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
  11. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
  12. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
16 more
  1. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 680
  2. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  3. 2017Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 460
  4. 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
  5. 2019Learning Likelihoods with Conditional Normalizing Flowscited by 170
  6. 2019Hamiltonian Generative Networkscited by 136
  7. 2019Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 106
  8. 2017PacGAN: The power of two samples in generative adversarial networkscited by 104
  9. 2019Equivariant Hamiltonian Flowscited by 39
  10. 2019A Closer Look at the Optimization Landscapes of Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 25
  11. 2022Learning Hamiltonians of constrained mechanical systemscited by 14
  12. 2018Fast cosmic web simulations with generative adversarial networkscited by 13
  13. 2018Mixture Density Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 9
  14. 2023Machine Fault Classification using Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 3
  15. 2022Bayesian Inference with Latent Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 2
  16. 2022Continuous Methods : Hamiltonian Domain Translationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.