mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LSA-PINN: Linear Boundary Connectivity Loss for Solving PDEs on Complex Geometry

arXiv 2302.01518 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.CE physics.flu-dyncited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a novel loss formulation for efficient learning of complex dynamics from governing physics, typically described by partial differential equations (PDEs), using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). In our experiments, existing versions of PINNs are seen to learn poorly in many problems, especially for complex geometries, as it becomes increasingly difficult to establish appropriate sampling strategy at the near boundary region. Overly dense sampling can adversely impede training convergence if the local gradient behaviors are too complex to be adequately modelled by PINNs. On the other hand, if the samples are too sparse, existing PINNs tend to overfit the near boundary region, leading to incorrect solution. To prevent such issues, we propose a new Boundary Connectivity (BCXN) loss function which provides linear local structure approximation (LSA) to the gradient behaviors at the boundary for PINN. Our BCXN-loss implicitly imposes local structure during training, thus facilitating fast physics-informed learning across entire problem domains with order of magnitude sparser training samples. This LSA-PINN method shows a few orders of magnitude smaller errors than existing methods in terms of the standard L2-norm metric, while using dramatically fewer training samples and iterations. Our proposed LSA-PINN does not pose any requirement on the differentiable property of the networks, and we demonstrate its benefits and ease of implementation on both multi-layer perceptron and convolutional neural network versions as commonly used in current PINN literature.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2023.

Builds on

33 of 62 references.

References · 33

  1. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  2. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 617
  3. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
  4. 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 279
  5. 2021Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse designcited by 277
  6. 2022A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networkscited by 233
  7. 2020Self-Adaptive Physics-Informed Neural Networks using a Soft Attention Mechanismcited by 231
  8. 2020PhyGeoNet: Physics-Informed Geometry-Adaptive Convolutional Neural Networks for Solving Parameterized Steady-State PDEs on Irregular Domaincited by 173
  9. 2022Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networkscited by 154
  10. 2017A unified deep artificial neural network approach to partial differential equations in complex geometriescited by 122
  11. 2020Solving Allen-Cahn and Cahn-Hilliard Equations using the Adaptive Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 122
  12. 2021Parallel Physics-Informed Neural Networks via Domain Decompositioncited by 112
21 more
  1. 2021Efficient training of physics-informed neural networks via importance samplingcited by 109
  2. 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEscited by 101
  3. 2021PhyCRNet: Physics-informed Convolutional-Recurrent Network for Solving Spatiotemporal PDEscited by 97
  4. 2021CAN-PINN: A Fast Physics-Informed Neural Network Based on Coupled-Automatic-Numerical Differentiation Methodcited by 93
  5. 2021Multi-Objective Loss Balancing for Physics-Informed Deep Learningcited by 86
  6. 2020Local Extreme Learning Machines and Domain Decomposition for Solving Linear and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 78
  7. 2021The Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?cited by 61
  8. 2021Learning in Sinusoidal Spaces with Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 61
  9. 2019D3M: A deep domain decomposition method for partial differential equationscited by 44
  10. 2021Inverse-Dirichlet Weighting Enables Reliable Training of Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 43
  11. 2021Machine Learning For Elliptic PDEs: Fast Rate Generalization Bound, Neural Scaling Law and Minimax Optimalitycited by 40
  12. 2021Spline-PINN: Approaching PDEs without Data using Fast, Physics-Informed Hermite-Spline CNNscited by 38
  13. 2020DiscretizationNet: A Machine-Learning based solver for Navier-Stokes Equations using Finite Volume Discretizationcited by 35
  14. 2021SPINN: Sparse, Physics-based, and partially Interpretable Neural Networks for PDEscited by 32
  15. 2020Iterative Surrogate Model Optimization (ISMO): An active learning algorithm for PDE constrained optimization with deep neural networkscited by 26
  16. 2020Teaching the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations to Fast Neural Surrogate Models in 3Dcited by 26
  17. 2021Hybrid FEM-NN models: Combining artificial neural networks with the finite element methodcited by 24
  18. 2018A Deep Neural Network Surrogate for High-Dimensional Random Partial Differential Equationscited by 23
  19. 2021Adversarial Multi-task Learning Enhanced Physics-informed Neural Networks for Solving Partial Differential Equationscited by 13
  20. 2020CoPhy-PGNN: Learning Physics-guided Neural Networks with Competing Loss Functions for Solving Eigenvalue Problemscited by 11
  21. 2021Physics-aware deep neural networks for surrogate modeling of turbulent natural convectioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.