mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Teaching the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations to Fast Neural Surrogate Models in 3D

arXiv 2012.11893 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2020physics.flu-dyn cs.LGcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physically plausible fluid simulations play an important role in modern computer graphics and engineering. However, in order to achieve real-time performance, computational speed needs to be traded-off with physical accuracy. Surrogate fluid models based on neural networks have the potential to achieve both, fast fluid simulations and high physical accuracy. However, these approaches rely on massive amounts of training data, require complex pipelines for training and inference or do not generalize to new fluid domains. In this work, we present significant extensions to a recently proposed deep learning framework, which addresses the aforementioned challenges in 2D. We go from 2D to 3D and propose an efficient architecture to cope with the high demands of 3D grids in terms of memory and computational complexity. Furthermore, we condition the neural fluid model on additional information about the fluid's viscosity and density which allows simulating laminar as well as turbulent flows based on the same surrogate model. Our method allows to train fluid models without requiring fluid simulation data beforehand. Inference is fast and simple, as the fluid model directly maps a fluid state and boundary conditions at a moment t to a subsequent fluid state at t+dt. We obtain real-time fluid simulations on a 128x64x64 grid that include various fluid phenomena such as the Magnus effect or Karman vortex streets and generalize to domain geometries not considered during training. Our method indicates strong improvements in terms of accuracy, speed and generalization capabilities over current 3D NN-based fluid models.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 6; 2024: 9; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

26 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEscited by 293
  2. 2021CAN-PINN: A Fast Physics-Informed Neural Network Based on Coupled-Automatic-Numerical Differentiation Methodcited by 93
  3. 2024Weak baselines and reporting biases lead to overoptimism in machine learning for fluid-related partial differential equationscited by 87
  4. 2022Multi-resolution partial differential equations preserved learning framework for spatiotemporal dynamicscited by 44
  5. 2025MORPH: PDE Foundation Models with Arbitrary Data Modalitycited by 12
  6. 2023Monte Carlo Neural PDE Solver for Learning PDEs via Probabilistic Representationcited by 11
  7. 2022LordNet: An Efficient Neural Network for Learning to Solve Parametric Partial Differential Equations without Simulated Datacited by 10
  8. 2024Automatic Differentiation is Essential in Training Neural Networks for Solving Differential Equationscited by 9
  9. 2024Pi-fusion: Physics-informed diffusion model for learning fluid dynamicscited by 9
  10. 2025PhysicsCorrect: A Training-Free Approach for Stable Neural PDE Simulationscited by 8
  11. 2024A conditional latent autoregressive recurrent model for generation and forecasting of beam dynamics in particle acceleratorscited by 7
  12. 2024Metamizer: a versatile neural optimizer for fast and accurate physics simulationscited by 7
14 more
  1. 2022Towards Size-Independent Generalization Bounds for Deep Operator Netscited by 6
  2. 2023ST-PINN: A Self-Training Physics-Informed Neural Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 6
  3. 2024Time-inversion of spatiotemporal beam dynamics using uncertainty-aware latent evolution reversalcited by 6
  4. 2022Accelerating hydrodynamic simulations of urban drainage systems with physics-guided machine learningcited by 4
  5. 2022RBF-MGN:Solving spatiotemporal PDEs with Physics-informed Graph Neural Networkcited by 4
  6. 2023LSA-PINN: Linear Boundary Connectivity Loss for Solving PDEs on Complex Geometrycited by 4
  7. 2023Auxiliary-Tasks Learning for Physics-Informed Neural Network-Based Partial Differential Equations Solvingcited by 2
  8. 2023Investigating the Ability of PINNs To Solve Burgers' PDE Near Finite-Time BlowUpcited by 2
  9. 2024Preconditioned FEM-based Neural Networks for Solving Incompressible Fluid Flows and Related Inverse Problemscited by 2
  10. 2025Noisy PDE Training Requires Bigger PINNscited by 2
  11. 2024Finite-difference-informed graph network for solving steady-state incompressible flows on block-structured gridscited by 1
  12. 2025Learning an Implicit Physics Model for Image-based Fluid Simulationcited by 1
  13. 2024Improving PINNs By Algebraic Inclusion of Boundary and Initial Conditionscited by 0
  14. 2026Generalization Bounds for Physics-Informed Neural Networks for the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equationscited by 0