Model Monitoring and Robustness of In-Use Machine Learning Models: Quantifying Data Distribution Shifts Using Population Stability Index
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Safety goes first. Meeting and maintaining industry safety standards for robustness of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models require continuous monitoring for faults and performance drops. Deep learning models are widely used in industrial applications, e.g., computer vision, but the susceptibility of their performance to environment changes (e.g., noise) after deployment on the product, are now well-known. A major challenge is detecting data distribution shifts that happen, comparing the following: bf (i) development stage of AI and ML models, i.e., train/validation/test, to bf (ii) deployment stage on the product (i.e., even after `testing') in the environment. We focus on a computer vision example related to autonomous driving and aim at detecting shifts that occur as a result of adding noise to images. We use the population stability index (PSI) as a measure of presence and intensity of shift and present results of our empirical experiments showing a promising potential for the PSI. We further discuss multiple aspects of model monitoring and robustness that need to be analyzed simultaneously to achieve robustness for industry safety standards. We propose the need for and the research direction toward categorizations of problem classes and examples where monitoring for robustness is required and present challenges and pointers for future work from a practical perspective.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2023.
Builds on
31 of 48 references.
References · 31
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
- 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
- 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 248
19 more
- 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
- 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
- 2021A Universal Law of Robustness via Isoperimetrycited by 150
- 2018Strike (with) a Pose: Neural Networks Are Easily Fooled by Strange Poses of Familiar Objectscited by 143
- 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performancecited by 141
- 2020Can Autonomous Vehicles Identify, Recover From, and Adapt to Distribution Shifts?cited by 139
- 2020Adversarial Machine Learning -- Industry Perspectivescited by 121
- 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
- 2022Agreement-on-the-Line: Predicting the Performance of Neural Networks under Distribution Shiftcited by 94
- 2022Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 87
- 2021On the effectiveness of adversarial training against common corruptionscited by 71
- 2020How to Train Neural Networks for Flare Removalcited by 50
- 2020Unadversarial Examples: Designing Objects for Robust Visioncited by 45
- 2022Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks: A Survey from a Formal Verification Perspectivecited by 41
- 2022Lyapunov Density Models: Constraining Distribution Shift in Learning-Based Controlcited by 28
- 2021Out-of-Distribution Detection for Medical Applications: Guidelines for Practical Evaluationcited by 15
- 2022Evaluating Robustness to Dataset Shift via Parametric Robustness Setscited by 10
- 2020A Causal Lens for Peeking into Black Box Predictive Models: Predictive Model Interpretation via Causal Attributioncited by 5
- 2022A proposed simulation technique for population stability testing in credit risk scorecardscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2024On the Potential of Network-Based Features for Fraud Detectioncited by 1
- 2026Adversarial Evasion in Non-Stationary Malware Detection: Minimizing Drift Signals through Similarity-Constrained Perturbationscited by 0
- 2026When Drift Detectors cry Wolf: False Alarm Rates in continuous ML Monitoringcited by 0
- 2026When Drift Detectors cry Wolf: False Alarm Rates in continuous ML Monitoring19 Jul 2026
- 2026Adversarial Evasion in Non-Stationary Malware Detection: Minimizing Drift Signals through Similarity-Constrained Perturbations23 Apr 2026
- 2024On the Potential of Network-Based Features for Fraud Detection14 Feb 2024