General Gaussian Noise Mechanisms and Their Optimality for Unbiased Mean Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate unbiased high-dimensional mean estimators in differential privacy. We consider differentially private mechanisms whose expected output equals the mean of the input dataset, for every dataset drawn from a fixed bounded d-dimensional domain K. A classical approach to private mean estimation is to compute the true mean and add unbiased, but possibly correlated, Gaussian noise to it. In the first part of this paper, we study the optimal error achievable by a Gaussian noise mechanism for a given domain K when the error is measured in the ℓp norm for some p ≥ 2. We give algorithms that compute the optimal covariance for the Gaussian noise for a given K under suitable assumptions, and prove a number of nice geometric properties of the optimal error. These results generalize the theory of factorization mechanisms from domains K that are symmetric and finite (or, equivalently, symmetric polytopes) to arbitrary bounded domains. In the second part of the paper we show that Gaussian noise mechanisms achieve nearly optimal error among all private unbiased mean estimation mechanisms in a very strong sense. In particular, for every input dataset, an unbiased mean estimator satisfying concentrated differential privacy introduces approximately at least as much error as the best Gaussian noise mechanism. We extend this result to local differential privacy, and to approximate differential privacy, but for the latter the error lower bound holds either for a dataset or for a neighboring dataset, and this relaxation is necessary.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2023.
Builds on
17 of 41 references.
References · 17
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 139
- 2016Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimationcited by 103
- 2013Fingerprinting Codes and the Price of Approximate Differential Privacycited by 81
- 2022Multi-Epoch Matrix Factorization Mechanisms for Private Machine Learningcited by 48
- 2021Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential Privacycited by 37
- 2019The Power of Factorization Mechanisms in Local and Central Differential Privacycited by 30
- 2018Optimizing error of high-dimensional statistical queries under differential privacycited by 29
- 2022Almost Tight Error Bounds on Differentially Private Continual Countingcited by 25
- 2020Near Instance-Optimality in Differential Privacycited by 23
- 2013Efficient Algorithms for Privately Releasing Marginals via Convex Relaxationscited by 17
- 2022Differentially Private Covariance Revisitedcited by 15
5 more
- 2020Bias and Variance of Post-processing in Differential Privacycited by 14
- 2023A Bias-Accuracy-Privacy Trilemma for Statistical Estimationcited by 12
- 2022Instance-Optimal Differentially Private Estimationcited by 7
- 2023Privacy and Bias Analysis of Disclosure Avoidance Systemscited by 2
- 2021A Nearly Instance-optimal Differentially Private Mechanism for Conjunctive Queriescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.