mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Confidence-Aware Calibration and Scoring Functions for Curriculum Learning

arXiv 2301.12589 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2023cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the great success of state-of-the-art deep neural networks, several studies have reported models to be over-confident in predictions, indicating miscalibration. Label Smoothing has been proposed as a solution to the over-confidence problem and works by softening hard targets during training, typically by distributing part of the probability mass from a `one-hot' label uniformly to all other labels. However, neither model nor human confidence in a label are likely to be uniformly distributed in this manner, with some labels more likely to be confused than others. In this paper we integrate notions of model confidence and human confidence with label smoothing, respectively textitModel Confidence LS and textitHuman Confidence LS, to achieve better model calibration and generalization. To enhance model generalization, we show how our model and human confidence scores can be successfully applied to curriculum learning, a training strategy inspired by learning of `easier to harder' tasks. A higher model or human confidence score indicates a more recognisable and therefore easier sample, and can therefore be used as a scoring function to rank samples in curriculum learning. We evaluate our proposed methods with four state-of-the-art architectures for image and text classification task, using datasets with multi-rater label annotations by humans. We report that integrating model or human confidence information in label smoothing and curriculum learning improves both model performance and model calibration. The code are available at urlhttps://github.com/AoShuang92/ConfidenceCalibrationCL.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2023.

Builds on

25 of 38 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  6. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  7. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  8. 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,101
  9. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
  10. 2018Cooperative Learning of Audio and Video Models from Self-Supervised Synchronizationcited by 249
  11. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 235
  12. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
13 more
  1. 2019Competence-based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 202
  2. 2018CurriculumNet: Weakly Supervised Learning from Large-Scale Web Imagescited by 126
  3. 2021ArtEmis: Affective Language for Visual Artcited by 104
  4. 2016Towards better decoding and language model integration in sequence to sequence modelscited by 100
  5. 2015STC: A Simple to Complex Framework for Weakly-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 78
  6. 2014Curriculum Learning of Multiple Taskscited by 66
  7. 2017Curriculum Learning and Minibatch Bucketing in Neural Machine Translationcited by 63
  8. 2019Simple and Effective Curriculum Pointer-Generator Networks for Reading Comprehension over Long Narrativescited by 59
  9. 2018An Empirical Exploration of Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 58
  10. 2017How hard can it be? Estimating the difficulty of visual search in an imagecited by 52
  11. 2021A Loss Curvature Perspective on Training Instability in Deep Learningcited by 40
  12. 2020Learn like a Pathologist: Curriculum Learning by Annotator Agreement for Histopathology Image Classificationcited by 29
  13. 2019Curriculum Learning Strategies for IR: An Empirical Study on Conversation Response Rankingcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.