ActiveLab: Active Learning with Re-Labeling by Multiple Annotators
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In real-world data labeling applications, annotators often provide imperfect labels. It is thus common to employ multiple annotators to label data with some overlap between their examples. We study active learning in such settings, aiming to train an accurate classifier by collecting a dataset with the fewest total annotations. Here we propose ActiveLab, a practical method to decide what to label next that works with any classifier model and can be used in pool-based batch active learning with one or multiple annotators. ActiveLab automatically estimates when it is more informative to re-label examples vs. labeling entirely new ones. This is a key aspect of producing high quality labels and trained models within a limited annotation budget. In experiments on image and tabular data, ActiveLab reliably trains more accurate classifiers with far fewer annotations than a wide variety of popular active learning methods.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2023.
Builds on
12 of 34 references.
References · 12
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
- 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 368
- 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
- 2022A Comparative Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 88
- 2021Active label cleaning for improved dataset quality under resource constraintscited by 44
- 2022CROWDLAB: Supervised learning to infer consensus labels and quality scores for data with multiple annotatorscited by 16
- 2018Leveraging Crowdsourcing Data For Deep Active Learning - An Application: Learning Intents in Alexacited by 11
- 2021Clean or Annotate: How to Spend a Limited Data Collection Budgetcited by 10
- 2021Single versus Multiple Annotation for Named Entity Recognition of Mutationscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023Estimating label quality and errors in semantic segmentation data via any modelcited by 12
- 2024NoisyEQA: Benchmarking Embodied Question Answering Against Noisy Queriescited by 10
- 2024Active Label Refinement for Robust Training of Imbalanced Medical Image Classification Tasks in the Presence of High Label Noisecited by 3
- 2026An Analysis of Active Learning Algorithms using Real-World Crowd-sourced Text Annotationscited by 0
- 2026Deep Active Re-Labeling: Toward Noise-Resilient Annotation Efficiencycited by 0
- 2026Deep Active Re-Labeling: Toward Noise-Resilient Annotation Efficiency7 Jun 2026
- 2026An Analysis of Active Learning Algorithms using Real-World Crowd-sourced Text Annotations25 Apr 2026
- 2024NoisyEQA: Benchmarking Embodied Question Answering Against Noisy Queries14 Dec 2024
- 2024Active Label Refinement for Robust Training of Imbalanced Medical Image Classification Tasks in the Presence of High Label Noise8 Jul 2024
- 2023Estimating label quality and errors in semantic segmentation data via any model11 Jul 2023