Adapting Step-size: A Unified Perspective to Analyze and Improve Gradient-based Methods for Adversarial Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning adversarial examples can be formulated as an optimization problem of maximizing the loss function with some box-constraints. However, for solving this induced optimization problem, the state-of-the-art gradient-based methods such as FGSM, I-FGSM and MI-FGSM look different from their original methods especially in updating the direction, which makes it difficult to understand them and then leaves some theoretical issues to be addressed in viewpoint of optimization. In this paper, from the perspective of adapting step-size, we provide a unified theoretical interpretation of these gradient-based adversarial learning methods. We show that each of these algorithms is in fact a specific reformulation of their original gradient methods but using the step-size rules with only current gradient information. Motivated by such analysis, we present a broad class of adaptive gradient-based algorithms based on the regular gradient methods, in which the step-size strategy utilizing information of the accumulated gradients is integrated. Such adaptive step-size strategies directly normalize the scale of the gradients rather than use some empirical operations. The important benefit is that convergence for the iterative algorithms is guaranteed and then the whole optimization process can be stabilized. The experiments demonstrate that our AdaI-FGM consistently outperforms I-FGSM and AdaMI-FGM remains competitive with MI-FGSM for black-box attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2023.
Builds on
23 of 33 references.
References · 23
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
- 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,021
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
11 more
- 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 499
- 2019Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Scale Invariance for Adversarial Attackscited by 352
- 2020AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed Gradientscited by 282
- 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 248
- 2021On the Convergence and Robustness of Adversarial Trainingcited by 127
- 2020Making Adversarial Examples More Transferable and Indistinguishablecited by 19
- 2019Heavy-ball Algorithms Always Escape Saddle Pointscited by 13
- 2021Adversarial example generation with AdaBelief Optimizer and Crop Invariancecited by 12
- 2022Proving Common Mechanisms Shared by Twelve Methods of Boosting Adversarial Transferabilitycited by 12
- 2020The Strength of Nesterov's Extrapolation in the Individual Convergence of Nonsmooth Optimizationcited by 9
- 2021The Role of Momentum Parameters in the Optimal Convergence of Adaptive Polyak's Heavy-ball Methodscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.