GAR: Generalized Autoregression for Multi-Fidelity Fusion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many scientific research and engineering applications where repeated simulations of complex systems are conducted, a surrogate is commonly adopted to quickly estimate the whole system. To reduce the expensive cost of generating training examples, it has become a promising approach to combine the results of low-fidelity (fast but inaccurate) and high-fidelity (slow but accurate) simulations. Despite the fast developments of multi-fidelity fusion techniques, most existing methods require particular data structures and do not scale well to high-dimensional output. To resolve these issues, we generalize the classic autoregression (AR), which is wildly used due to its simplicity, robustness, accuracy, and tractability, and propose generalized autoregression (GAR) using tensor formulation and latent features. GAR can deal with arbitrary dimensional outputs and arbitrary multifidelity data structure to satisfy the demand of multi-fidelity fusion for complex problems; it admits a fully tractable likelihood and posterior requiring no approximate inference and scales well to high-dimensional problems. Furthermore, we prove the autokrigeability theorem based on GAR in the multi-fidelity case and develop CIGAR, a simplified GAR with the exact predictive mean accuracy with computation reduction by a factor of d 3, where d is the dimensionality of the output. The empirical assessment includes many canonical PDEs and real scientific examples and demonstrates that the proposed method consistently outperforms the SOTA methods with a large margin (up to 6x improvement in RMSE) with only a couple high-fidelity training samples.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2023.
Builds on
15 of 75 references.
References · 15
- 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 362
- 2015Kernel Interpolation for Scalable Structured Gaussian Processes (KISS-GP)cited by 175
- 2018Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimizationcited by 141
- 2017Machine Learning of Linear Differential Equations using Gaussian Processescited by 139
- 2013Gaussian Process Kernels for Pattern Discovery and Extrapolationcited by 131
- 2016Multi-Information Source Optimizationcited by 83
- 2018A General Framework for Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 52
- 2019Deep Gaussian Processes for Multi-fidelity Modelingcited by 48
- 2021Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Spatiotemporal Forecastingcited by 48
- 2020Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization via Deep Neural Networkscited by 46
- 2020Deep Multi-Fidelity Active Learning of High-dimensional Outputscited by 22
- 2022Multi-fidelity Hierarchical Neural Processescited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Self-Attention to Operator Learning-based 3D-IC Thermal Simulationcited by 6
- 2026FIRE: Multi-fidelity Regression with Distribution-conditioned In-context Learning using Tabular Foundation Modelscited by 1
- 2023Differentiable Multi-Fidelity Fusion: Efficient Learning of Physics Simulations with Neural Architecture Search and Transfer Learningcited by 0
- 2026FIRE: Multi-fidelity Regression with Distribution-conditioned In-context Learning using Tabular Foundation Models29 Jan 2026
- 2025Self-Attention to Operator Learning-based 3D-IC Thermal Simulation12 Oct 2025
- 2023Differentiable Multi-Fidelity Fusion: Efficient Learning of Physics Simulations with Neural Architecture Search and Transfer Learning12 Jun 2023