Fairly Private: Investigating The Fairness of Visual Privacy Preservation Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As the privacy risks posed by camera surveillance and facial recognition have grown, so has the research into privacy preservation algorithms. Among these, visual privacy preservation algorithms attempt to impart bodily privacy to subjects in visuals by obfuscating privacy-sensitive areas. While disparate performances of facial recognition systems across phenotypes are the subject of much study, its counterpart, privacy preservation, is not commonly analysed from a fairness perspective. In this paper, the fairness of commonly used visual privacy preservation algorithms is investigated through the performances of facial recognition models on obfuscated images. Experiments on the PubFig dataset clearly show that the privacy protection provided is unequal across groups.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2023.
Builds on
10 of 32 references.
References · 10
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 911
- 2020PULSE: Self-Supervised Photo Upsampling via Latent Space Exploration of Generative Modelscited by 358
- 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
- 2018Turning a Blind Eye: Explicit Removal of Biases and Variation from Deep Neural Network Embeddingscited by 114
- 2019Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected Datacited by 58
- 2020Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approachcited by 53
- 2021PASS: Protected Attribute Suppression System for Mitigating Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 38
- 2020Differentially Private and Fair Classification via Calibrated Functional Mechanismcited by 20
- 2018Eliminating Latent Discrimination: Train Then Maskcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.