mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mystique: Enabling Accurate and Scalable Generation of Production AI Benchmarks

arXiv 2301.04122 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2022cs.DC cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Building large AI fleets to support the rapidly growing DL workloads is an active research topic for modern cloud providers. Generating accurate benchmarks plays an essential role in designing the fast-paced software and hardware solutions in this space. Two fundamental challenges to make this scalable are (i) workload representativeness and (ii) the ability to quickly incorporate changes to the fleet into the benchmarks. To overcome these issues, we propose Mystique, an accurate and scalable framework for production AI benchmark generation. It leverages the PyTorch execution trace (ET), a new feature that captures the runtime information of AI models at the granularity of operators, in a graph format, together with their metadata. By sourcing fleet ETs, we can build AI benchmarks that are portable and representative. Mystique is scalable, due to its lightweight data collection, in terms of runtime overhead and instrumentation effort. It is also adaptive because ET composability allows flexible control on benchmark creation. We evaluate our methodology on several production AI models, and show that benchmarks generated with Mystique closely resemble original AI models, both in execution time and system-level metrics. We also showcase the portability of the generated benchmarks across platforms, and demonstrate several use cases enabled by the fine-grained composability of the execution trace.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2022.

Builds on

25 of 59 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  5. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
  6. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  7. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  8. 2017In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unitcited by 610
  9. 2017Deep Interest Network for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 541
  10. 2019Deep Learning Recommendation Model for Personalization and Recommendation Systemscited by 327
  11. 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
  12. 2019MLPerf Inference Benchmarkcited by 195
13 more
  1. 2021MLPerf Tiny Benchmarkcited by 118
  2. 2019MLPerf Training Benchmarkcited by 114
  3. 2019The Architectural Implications of Facebook's DNN-based Personalized Recommendationcited by 83
  4. 2020Chasing Carbon: The Elusive Environmental Footprint of Computingcited by 71
  5. 2018Predicting the Computational Cost of Deep Learning Modelscited by 49
  6. 2021Understanding Data Storage and Ingestion for Large-Scale Deep Recommendation Model Trainingcited by 28
  7. 2020Daydream: Accurately Estimating the Efficacy of Optimizations for DNN Trainingcited by 22
  8. 2016Fathom: Reference Workloads for Modern Deep Learning Methodscited by 20
  9. 2020Cross-Stack Workload Characterization of Deep Recommendation Systemscited by 11
  10. 2022Building a Performance Model for Deep Learning Recommendation Model Training on GPUscited by 10
  11. 2020Characterizing and Modeling Distributed Training with Transient Cloud GPU Serverscited by 8
  12. 2018The Architectural Implications of Microservices in the Cloudcited by 4
  13. 2020MicroGrad: A Centralized Framework for Workload Cloning and Stress Testingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.