On the Forces of Driver Distraction: Explainable Predictions for the Visual Demand of In-Vehicle Touchscreen Interactions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With modern infotainment systems, drivers are increasingly tempted to engage in secondary tasks while driving. Since distracted driving is already one of the main causes of fatal accidents, in-vehicle touchscreen Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs) must be as little distracting as possible. To ensure that these systems are safe to use, they undergo elaborate and expensive empirical testing, requiring fully functional prototypes. Thus, early-stage methods informing designers about the implication their design may have on driver distraction are of great value. This paper presents a machine learning method that, based on anticipated usage scenarios, predicts the visual demand of in-vehicle touchscreen interactions and provides local and global explanations of the factors influencing drivers' visual attention allocation. The approach is based on large-scale natural driving data continuously collected from production line vehicles and employs the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method to provide explanations leveraging informed design decisions. Our approach is more accurate than related work and identifies interactions during which long glances occur with 68 % accuracy and predicts the total glance duration with a mean error of 2.4 s. Our explanations replicate the results of various recent studies and provide fast and easily accessible insights into the effect of UI elements, driving automation, and vehicle speed on driver distraction. The system can not only help designers to evaluate current designs but also help them to better anticipate and understand the implications their design decisions might have on future designs.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2023.
Builds on
10 of 79 references.
References · 10
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
- 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 285
- 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
- 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
- 2020The Role and Potentials of Field User Interaction Data in the Automotive UX Development Lifecycle: An Industry Perspectivecited by 2
- 2022How Do Drivers Self-Regulate their Secondary Task Engagements? The Effect of Driving Automation on Touchscreen Interactions and Glance Behaviorcited by 2
- 2021Visualizing Event Sequence Data for User Behavior Evaluation of In-Vehicle Information Systemscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.