Online learning techniques for prediction of temporal tabular datasets with regime changes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The application of deep learning to non-stationary temporal datasets can lead to overfitted models that underperform under regime changes. In this work, we propose a modular machine learning pipeline for ranking predictions on temporal panel datasets which is robust under regime changes. The modularity of the pipeline allows the use of different models, including Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDTs) and Neural Networks, with and without feature engineering. We evaluate our framework on financial data for stock portfolio prediction, and find that GBDT models with dropout display high performance, robustness and generalisability with reduced complexity and computational cost. We then demonstrate how online learning techniques, which require no retraining of models, can be used post-prediction to enhance the results. First, we show that dynamic feature projection improves robustness by reducing drawdown in regime changes. Second, we demonstrate that dynamical model ensembling based on selection of models with good recent performance leads to improved Sharpe and Calmar ratios of out-of-sample predictions. We also evaluate the robustness of our pipeline across different data splits and random seeds with good reproducibility.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2022.
Builds on
20 of 47 references.
References · 20
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2019Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecastingcited by 748
- 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
- 2017Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 516
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 489
8 more
- 2019Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 200
- 2021Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular Datasetscited by 151
- 2022Leakage and the Reproducibility Crisis in ML-based Sciencecited by 63
- 2022Sources of Irreproducibility in Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 28
- 2022The worst of both worlds: A comparative analysis of errors in learning from data in psychology and machine learningcited by 17
- 2015DART: Dropouts meet Multiple Additive Regression Treescited by 15
- 2020Machine Learning Pipelines: Provenance, Reproducibility and FAIR Data Principlescited by 14
- 2021The challenge of reproducible ML: an empirical study on the impact of bugscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.