mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Machine Learning Pipelines: Provenance, Reproducibility and FAIR Data Principles

arXiv 2006.12117 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2020cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) is an increasingly important scientific tool supporting decision making and knowledge generation in numerous fields. With this, it also becomes more and more important that the results of ML experiments are reproducible. Unfortunately, that often is not the case. Rather, ML, similar to many other disciplines, faces a reproducibility crisis. In this paper, we describe our goals and initial steps in supporting the end-to-end reproducibility of ML pipelines. We investigate which factors beyond the availability of source code and datasets influence reproducibility of ML experiments. We propose ways to apply FAIR data practices to ML workflows. We present our preliminary results on the role of our tool, ProvBook, in capturing and comparing provenance of ML experiments and their reproducibility using Jupyter Notebooks.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort: