Simple Yet Surprisingly Effective Training Strategies for LSTMs in Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is one of the core research areas in mobile and wearable computing. With the application of deep learning (DL) techniques such as CNN, recognizing periodic or static activities (e.g, walking, lying, cycling, etc.) has become a well studied problem. What remains a major challenge though is the sporadic activity recognition (SAR) problem, where activities of interest tend to be non periodic, and occur less frequently when compared with the often large amount of irrelevant background activities. Recent works suggested that sequential DL models (such as LSTMs) have great potential for modeling nonperiodic behaviours, and in this paper we studied some LSTM training strategies for SAR. Specifically, we proposed two simple yet effective LSTM variants, namely delay model and inverse model, for two SAR scenarios (with and without time critical requirement). For time critical SAR, the delay model can effectively exploit predefined delay intervals (within tolerance) in form of contextual information for improved performance. For regular SAR task, the second proposed, inverse model can learn patterns from the time series in an inverse manner, which can be complementary to the forward model (i.e.,LSTM), and combining both can boost the performance. These two LSTM variants are very practical, and they can be deemed as training strategies without alteration of the LSTM fundamentals. We also studied some additional LSTM training strategies, which can further improve the accuracy. We evaluated our models on two SAR and one non-SAR datasets, and the promising results demonstrated the effectiveness of our approaches in HAR applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2022.
Builds on
11 of 52 references.
References · 11
- 2016Deep, Convolutional, and Recurrent Models for Human Activity Recognition using Wearablescited by 94
- 2022Self-supervised Learning for Human Activity Recognition Using 700,000 Person-days of Wearable Datacited by 75
- 2022Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition using Wearablescited by 65
- 2017Ensembles of Deep LSTM Learners for Activity Recognition using Wearablescited by 62
- 2020Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognitioncited by 55
- 2018On Attention Models for Human Activity Recognitioncited by 34
- 2021Adversarial Deep Feature Extraction Network for User Independent Human Activity Recognitioncited by 10
- 2022Learning Disentangled Behaviour Patterns for Wearable-based Human Activity Recognitioncited by 9
- 2019Towards Reliable, Automated General Movement Assessment for Perinatal Stroke Screening in Infants Using Wearable Accelerometerscited by 8
- 2022Investigating Enhancements to Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognitioncited by 6
- 2020Fatigue Assessment using ECG and Actigraphy Sensorscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.