Bias Mitigation Framework for Intersectional Subgroups in Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a fairness-aware learning framework that mitigates intersectional subgroup bias associated with protected attributes. Prior research has primarily focused on mitigating one kind of bias by incorporating complex fairness-driven constraints into optimization objectives or designing additional layers that focus on specific protected attributes. We introduce a simple and generic bias mitigation approach that prevents models from learning relationships between protected attributes and output variable by reducing mutual information between them. We demonstrate that our approach is effective in reducing bias with little or no drop in accuracy. We also show that the models trained with our learning framework become causally fair and insensitive to the values of protected attributes. Finally, we validate our approach by studying feature interactions between protected and non-protected attributes. We demonstrate that these interactions are significantly reduced when applying our bias mitigation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Dec 2022.
Builds on
21 of 40 references.
References · 21
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
- 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
- 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
- 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 126
- 2019Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspectivecited by 123
9 more
- 2018Learning Controllable Fair Representationscited by 83
- 2020How does this interaction affect me? Interpretable attribution for feature interactionscited by 73
- 2019Incorporating Priors with Feature Attribution on Text Classificationcited by 68
- 2016Learning to Pivot with Adversarial Networkscited by 55
- 2021Characterizing Intersectional Group Fairness with Worst-Case Comparisonscited by 42
- 2019Auditing and Achieving Intersectional Fairness in Classification Problemscited by 25
- 2019ProPublica's COMPAS Data Revisitedcited by 24
- 2019Learning Credible Deep Neural Networks with Rationale Regularizationcited by 18
- 2020Fairness with Overlapping Groupscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.