Vulnerabilities of Deep Learning-Driven Semantic Communications to Backdoor (Trojan) Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper highlights vulnerabilities of deep learning-driven semantic communications to backdoor (Trojan) attacks. Semantic communications aims to convey a desired meaning while transferring information from a transmitter to its receiver. An encoder-decoder pair that is represented by two deep neural networks (DNNs) as part of an autoencoder is trained to reconstruct signals such as images at the receiver by transmitting latent features of small size over a limited number of channel uses. In the meantime, another DNN of a semantic task classifier at the receiver is jointly trained with the autoencoder to check the meaning conveyed to the receiver. The complex decision space of the DNNs makes semantic communications susceptible to adversarial manipulations. In a backdoor (Trojan) attack, the adversary adds triggers to a small portion of training samples and changes the label to a target label. When the transfer of images is considered, the triggers can be added to the images or equivalently to the corresponding transmitted or received signals. In test time, the adversary activates these triggers by providing poisoned samples as input to the encoder (or decoder) of semantic communications. The backdoor attack can effectively change the semantic information transferred for the poisoned input samples to a target meaning. As the performance of semantic communications improves with the signal-to-noise ratio and the number of channel uses, the success of the backdoor attack increases as well. Also, increasing the Trojan ratio in training data makes the attack more successful. In the meantime, the effect of this attack on the unpoisoned input samples remains limited. Overall, this paper shows that the backdoor attack poses a serious threat to semantic communications and presents novel design guidelines to preserve the meaning of transferred information in the presence of backdoor attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2022.
Builds on
13 of 25 references.
References · 13
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
- 2020Deep Learning Enabled Semantic Communication Systemscited by 292
- 2017An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layercited by 233
- 2022Beyond Transmitting Bits: Context, Semantics, and Task-Oriented Communicationscited by 175
- 2021Learning Task-Oriented Communication for Edge Inference: An Information Bottleneck Approachcited by 110
- 2021Semantic Communication Systems for Speech Transmissioncited by 97
- 2021Semantic Communications: Principles and Challengescited by 91
- 2022Wireless Semantic Communications for Video Conferencingcited by 50
- 2020Adversarial Machine Learning in Wireless Communications using RF Data: A Reviewcited by 25
- 2022Task-Oriented Communications for NextG: End-to-End Deep Learning and AI Security Aspectscited by 20
- 2019Trojan Attacks on Wireless Signal Classification with Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 15
- 2021Adversarial Machine Learning for 5G Communications Securitycited by 12
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2024Will 6G be Semantic Communications? Opportunities and Challenges from Task Oriented and Secure Communications to Integrated Sensingcited by 11
- 2023Age of Information in Deep Learning-Driven Task-Oriented Communicationscited by 9
- 2023Multi-Receiver Task-Oriented Communications via Multi-Task Deep Learningcited by 5
- 2024Transformer-Aided Semantic Communicationscited by 3
- 2023Semantic Multi-Resolution Communicationscited by 2
- 2025Multi-Modal Semantic Communicationcited by 1
- 2025Targeted Attacks and Defenses for Distributed Federated Learning in Vehicular Networkscited by 0
- 2026Detecting Semantic Backdoors in a Mystery Shopping Scenariocited by 0
- 2026Toward Polymorphic Backdoor against Semantic Communication via Intensity-Based Poisoningcited by 0
- 2026Wireless Backdoor Attack and Defense for Semantic Communications over Multiple Access Channelcited by 0
- 2026Wireless Backdoor Attack and Defense for Semantic Communications over Multiple Access Channel29 Jun 2026
- 2026Toward Polymorphic Backdoor against Semantic Communication via Intensity-Based Poisoning25 Apr 2026
- 2026Detecting Semantic Backdoors in a Mystery Shopping Scenario7 Jan 2026
- 2025Multi-Modal Semantic Communication17 Dec 2025
- 2025Targeted Attacks and Defenses for Distributed Federated Learning in Vehicular Networks16 Oct 2025
- 2024Transformer-Aided Semantic Communications2 May 2024
- 2024Will 6G be Semantic Communications? Opportunities and Challenges from Task Oriented and Secure Communications to Integrated Sensing3 Jan 2024
- 2023Semantic Multi-Resolution Communications22 Aug 2023
- 2023Multi-Receiver Task-Oriented Communications via Multi-Task Deep Learning14 Aug 2023
- 2023Age of Information in Deep Learning-Driven Task-Oriented Communications11 Jan 2023
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Backdoor Attacks and Defenses on Semantic-Symbol Reconstruction in Semantic Communications
- 2024An Invisible Backdoor Attack Based On Semantic Feature
- 2025Detecting Backdoor Attacks via Similarity in Semantic Communication Systems
- 2023Backdoor Mitigation by Correcting the Distribution of Neural Activations
- 2025SRD: Reinforcement-Learned Semantic Perturbation for Backdoor Defense in VLMs
- 2022Trojan Horse Training for Breaking Defenses against Backdoor Attacks in Deep Learning
- 2023A semantic backdoor attack against Graph Convolutional Networks
- 2022Training set cleansing of backdoor poisoning by self-supervised representation learning