mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Is Semantic Communications Secure? A Tale of Multi-Domain Adversarial Attacks

arXiv 2212.10438 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2022cs.CR cs.IT cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semantic communications seeks to transfer information from a source while conveying a desired meaning to its destination. We model the transmitter-receiver functionalities as an autoencoder followed by a task classifier that evaluates the meaning of the information conveyed to the receiver. The autoencoder consists of an encoder at the transmitter to jointly model source coding, channel coding, and modulation, and a decoder at the receiver to jointly model demodulation, channel decoding and source decoding. By augmenting the reconstruction loss with a semantic loss, the two deep neural networks (DNNs) of this encoder-decoder pair are interactively trained with the DNN of the semantic task classifier. This approach effectively captures the latent feature space and reliably transfers compressed feature vectors with a small number of channel uses while keeping the semantic loss low. We identify the multi-domain security vulnerabilities of using the DNNs for semantic communications. Based on adversarial machine learning, we introduce test-time (targeted and non-targeted) adversarial attacks on the DNNs by manipulating their inputs at different stages of semantic communications. As a computer vision attack, small perturbations are injected to the images at the input of the transmitter's encoder. As a wireless attack, small perturbations signals are transmitted to interfere with the input of the receiver's decoder. By launching these stealth attacks individually or more effectively in a combined form as a multi-domain attack, we show that it is possible to change the semantics of the transferred information even when the reconstruction loss remains low. These multi-domain adversarial attacks pose as a serious threat to the semantics of information transfer (with larger impact than conventional jamming) and raise the need of defense methods for the safe adoption of semantic communications.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2022.

Builds on

11 of 14 references.

References · 11

  1. 2020Deep Learning Enabled Semantic Communication Systemscited by 282
  2. 2017An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layercited by 227
  3. 2022Beyond Transmitting Bits: Context, Semantics, and Task-Oriented Communicationscited by 166
  4. 2021Learning Task-Oriented Communication for Edge Inference: An Information Bottleneck Approachcited by 105
  5. 2021Semantic Communication Systems for Speech Transmissioncited by 93
  6. 2021Semantic Communications: Principles and Challengescited by 90
  7. 2022Wireless Semantic Communications for Video Conferencingcited by 49
  8. 2022Deep Learning-Enabled Semantic Communication Systems with Task-Unaware Transmitter and Dynamic Datacited by 36
  9. 2020Channel-Aware Adversarial Attacks Against Deep Learning-Based Wireless Signal Classifierscited by 28
  10. 2020Adversarial Machine Learning in Wireless Communications using RF Data: A Reviewcited by 25
  11. 2019Physical Adversarial Attacks Against End-to-End Autoencoder Communication Systemscited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 8; 2024: 1.

10 papers.