mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ColorSense: A Study on Color Vision in Machine Visual Recognition

arXiv 2212.08650 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2022cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Color vision is essential for human visual perception, but its impact on machine perception is still underexplored. There has been an intensified demand for understanding its role in machine perception for safety-critical tasks such as assistive driving and surgery but lacking suitable datasets. To fill this gap, we curate multipurpose datasets ColorSense, by collecting 110,000 non-trivial human annotations of foreground and background color labels from popular visual recognition benchmarks. To investigate the impact of color vision on machine perception, we assign each image a color discrimination level based on its dominant foreground and background colors and use it to study the impact of color vision on machine perception. We validate the use of our datasets by demonstrating that the level of color discrimination has a dominating effect on the performance of mainstream machine perception models. Specifically, we examine the perception ability of machine vision by considering key factors such as model architecture, training objective, model size, training data, and task complexity. Furthermore, to investigate how color and environmental factors affect the robustness of visual recognition in machine perception, we integrate our ColorSense datasets with image corruptions and perform a more comprehensive visual perception evaluation. Our findings suggest that object recognition tasks such as classification and localization are susceptible to color vision bias, especially for high-stakes cases such as vehicle classes, and advanced mitigation techniques such as data augmentation and so on only give marginal improvement. Our analyses highlight the need for new approaches toward the performance evaluation of machine perception models in real-world applications. Lastly, we present various potential applications of ColorSense such as studying spurious correlations.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2022.

Builds on

31 of 77 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  6. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  7. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  8. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  9. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  10. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  11. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  12. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
19 more
  1. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  2. 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,215
  3. 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 978
  4. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  5. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
  6. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
  7. 2022Image as a Foreign Language: BEiT Pretraining for All Vision and Vision-Language Taskscited by 510
  8. 2022InternImage: Exploring Large-Scale Vision Foundation Models with Deformable Convolutionscited by 479
  9. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  10. 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 365
  11. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
  12. 2022OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 267
  13. 2021Are Convolutional Neural Networks or Transformers more like human vision?cited by 109
  14. 2020Beyond accuracy: quantifying trial-by-trial behaviour of CNNs and humans by measuring error consistencycited by 77
  15. 2021Pyramid Adversarial Training Improves ViT Performancecited by 39
  16. 2019What Else Can Fool Deep Learning? Addressing Color Constancy Errors on Deep Neural Network Performancecited by 37
  17. 2021Towards robust vision by multi-task learning on monkey visual cortexcited by 28
  18. 2022Weakly Supervised Object Localization via Transformer with Implicit Spatial Calibrationcited by 20
  19. 2021Contrast Sensitivity Functions in Autoencoderscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

5 papers.