mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dual Accuracy-Quality-Driven Neural Network for Prediction Interval Generation

arXiv 2212.06370 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate uncertainty quantification is necessary to enhance the reliability of deep learning models in real-world applications. In the case of regression tasks, prediction intervals (PIs) should be provided along with the deterministic predictions of deep learning models. Such PIs are useful or "high-quality" as long as they are sufficiently narrow and capture most of the probability density. In this paper, we present a method to learn prediction intervals for regression-based neural networks automatically in addition to the conventional target predictions. In particular, we train two companion neural networks: one that uses one output, the target estimate, and another that uses two outputs, the upper and lower bounds of the corresponding PI. Our main contribution is the design of a novel loss function for the PI-generation network that takes into account the output of the target-estimation network and has two optimization objectives: minimizing the mean prediction interval width and ensuring the PI integrity using constraints that maximize the prediction interval probability coverage implicitly. Furthermore, we introduce a self-adaptive coefficient that balances both objectives within the loss function, which alleviates the task of fine-tuning. Experiments using a synthetic dataset, eight benchmark datasets, and a real-world crop yield prediction dataset showed that our method was able to maintain a nominal probability coverage and produce significantly narrower PIs without detriment to its target estimation accuracy when compared to those PIs generated by three state-of-the-art neural-network-based methods. In other words, our method was shown to produce higher-quality PIs.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2022.

Builds on

17 of 47 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  3. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
  4. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  5. 2021Ensemble deep learning: A reviewcited by 284
  6. 2018High-Quality Prediction Intervals for Deep Learning: A Distribution-Free, Ensembled Approachcited by 117
  7. 2022Plex: Towards Reliability using Pretrained Large Model Extensionscited by 102
  8. 2019Subspace Inference for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 95
  9. 2019Analysis of Explainers of Black Box Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 93
  10. 2019Quality of Uncertainty Quantification for Bayesian Neural Network Inferencecited by 59
  11. 2021Can stable and accurate neural networks be computed? -- On the barriers of deep learning and Smale's 18th problemcited by 53
  12. 2017Deep and Confident Prediction for Time Series at Ubercited by 50
5 more
  1. 2019Radial Bayesian Neural Networks: Beyond Discrete Support In Large-Scale Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 37
  2. 2020Prediction Intervals: Split Normal Mixture from Quality-Driven Deep Ensemblescited by 14
  3. 2020PIVEN: A Deep Neural Network for Prediction Intervals with Specific Value Predictioncited by 5
  4. 2014The Two-Piece Normal, Binormal, or Double Gaussian Distribution: Its Origin and Rediscoveriescited by 1
  5. 2021Two-dimensional Deep Regression for Early Yield Prediction of Winter Wheatcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

5 papers.