mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Measuring the Driving Forces of Predictive Performance: Application to Credit Scoring

arXiv 2212.05866 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2022stat.ML cs.LG econ.EMcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As they play an increasingly important role in determining access to credit, credit scoring models are under growing scrutiny from banking supervisors and internal model validators. These authorities need to monitor the model performance and identify its key drivers. To facilitate this, we introduce the XPER methodology to decompose a performance metric (e.g., AUC, R2) into specific contributions associated with the various features of a forecasting model. XPER is theoretically grounded on Shapley values and is both model-agnostic and performance metric-agnostic. Furthermore, it can be implemented either at the model level or at the individual level. Using a novel dataset of car loans, we decompose the AUC of a machine-learning model trained to forecast the default probability of loan applicants. We show that a small number of features can explain a surprisingly large part of the model performance. Notably, the features that contribute the most to the predictive performance of the model may not be the ones that contribute the most to individual forecasts (SHAP). Finally, we show how XPER can be used to deal with heterogeneity issues and improve performance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2022.

Builds on

20 of 50 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  3. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
  4. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
  5. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 303
  6. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 279
  7. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  8. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 198
  9. 2019The Shapley Taylor Interaction Indexcited by 143
  10. 2016Panning for Gold: Model-X Knockoffs for High-dimensional Controlled Variable Selectioncited by 120
  11. 2020Efficient nonparametric statistical inference on population feature importance using Shapley valuescited by 61
  12. 2018Visualizing the Feature Importance for Black Box Modelscited by 55
8 more
  1. 2020A general framework for inference on algorithm-agnostic variable importancecited by 44
  2. 2020Statistical stability indices for LIME: obtaining reliable explanations for Machine Learning modelscited by 40
  3. 2022The Fairness of Credit Scoring Modelscited by 15
  4. 2020Variable Selection via Thompson Samplingcited by 7
  5. 2020Generalized SHAP: Generating multiple types of explanations in machine learningcited by 6
  6. 2022On Learning and Testing of Counterfactual Fairness through Data Preprocessingcited by 6
  7. 2020What are the most important statistical ideas of the past 50 years?cited by 3
  8. 2019Shapley Decomposition of R-Squared in Machine Learning Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.