mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mining Explainable Predictive Features for Water Quality Management

arXiv 2212.04419 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2022cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With water quality management processes, identifying and interpreting relationships between features, such as location and weather variable tuples, and water quality variables, such as levels of bacteria, is key to gaining insights and identifying areas where interventions should be made. There is a need for a search process to identify the locations and types of phenomena that are influencing water quality and a need to explain how the quality is being affected and which factors are most relevant. This paper addresses both of these issues. A process is developed for collecting data for features that represent a variety of variables over a spatial region and which are used for training models and inference. An analysis of the performance of the features is undertaken using the models and Shapley values. Shapley values originated in cooperative game theory and can be used to aid in the interpretation of machine learning results. Evaluations are performed using several machine learning algorithms and water quality data from the Dublin Grand Canal basin.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2022.

Builds on

6 of 24 references.

References · 6

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 603
  4. 2018Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networkscited by 314
  5. 2020Explainable Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 27
  6. 2018Automatic differentiation in ML: Where we are and where we should be goingcited by 20

Built on by

Not cited yet.