mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Vicious Classifiers: Assessing Inference-time Data Reconstruction Risk in Edge Computing

arXiv 2212.04223 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2022cs.LG cs.CR cs.ITcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Privacy-preserving inference in edge computing paradigms encourages the users of machine-learning services to locally run a model on their private input and only share the models outputs for a target task with the server. We study how a vicious server can reconstruct the input data by observing only the models outputs while keeping the target accuracy very close to that of a honest server by jointly training a target model (to run at users' side) and an attack model for data reconstruction (to secretly use at servers' side). We present a new measure to assess the inference-time reconstruction risk. Evaluations on six benchmark datasets show the model's input can be approximately reconstructed from the outputs of a single inference. We propose a primary defense mechanism to distinguish vicious versus honest classifiers at inference time. By studying such a risk associated with emerging ML services our work has implications for enhancing privacy in edge computing. We discuss open challenges and directions for future studies and release our code as a benchmark for the community at https://github.com/mmalekzadeh/vicious-classifiers .

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2022.

Builds on

25 of 44 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  5. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  6. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  7. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  8. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
  9. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 840
  10. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
  11. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 557
  12. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
13 more
  1. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 498
  2. 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
  3. 2020Multi-Task Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 375
  4. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
  5. 2019Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence with Edge Computingcited by 228
  6. 2018Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learningcited by 225
  7. 2017Towards Poisoning of Deep Learning Algorithms with Back-gradient Optimizationcited by 197
  8. 2021On the Importance of Difficulty Calibration in Membership Inference Attackscited by 147
  9. 2017Distributed Deep Neural Networks over the Cloud, the Edge and End Devicescited by 120
  10. 2020Feature Inference Attack on Model Predictions in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 106
  11. 2019Overlearning Reveals Sensitive Attributescited by 76
  12. 2021Honest-but-Curious Nets: Sensitive Attributes of Private Inputs Can Be Secretly Coded into the Classifiers' Outputscited by 18
  13. 2021SinIR: Efficient General Image Manipulation with Single Image Reconstructioncited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.