mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pre-trained Encoders in Self-Supervised Learning Improve Secure and Privacy-preserving Supervised Learning

arXiv 2212.03334 ↗First posted 6 Dec 2022cs.CR cs.CV cs.LGcited by 4

On the map: LLM safety and security → Backdoor and data poisoning attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Classifiers in supervised learning have various security and privacy issues, e.g., 1) data poisoning attacks, backdoor attacks, and adversarial examples on the security side as well as 2) inference attacks and the right to be forgotten for the training data on the privacy side. Various secure and privacy-preserving supervised learning algorithms with formal guarantees have been proposed to address these issues. However, they suffer from various limitations such as accuracy loss, small certified security guarantees, and/or inefficiency. Self-supervised learning is an emerging technique to pre-train encoders using unlabeled data. Given a pre-trained encoder as a feature extractor, supervised learning can train a simple yet accurate classifier using a small amount of labeled training data. In this work, we perform the first systematic, principled measurement study to understand whether and when a pre-trained encoder can address the limitations of secure or privacy-preserving supervised learning algorithms. Our key findings are that a pre-trained encoder substantially improves 1) both accuracy under no attacks and certified security guarantees against data poisoning and backdoor attacks of state-of-the-art secure learning algorithms (i.e., bagging and KNN), 2) certified security guarantees of randomized smoothing against adversarial examples without sacrificing its accuracy under no attacks, 3) accuracy of differentially private classifiers, and 4) accuracy and/or efficiency of exact machine unlearning.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 56 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2022.

Builds on

56 of 93 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021BadEncoder: Backdoor Attacks to Pre-trained Encoders in Self-Supervised Learning1 Aug
  2. 2021De-Pois: An Attack-Agnostic Defense against Data Poisoning Attacks8 May

Other references · 54

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  6. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  7. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  8. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  9. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  10. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  11. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  12. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
38 more
  1. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  2. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  3. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
  4. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  5. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  6. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  7. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  8. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  9. 2018Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 550
  10. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
  11. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
  12. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
  13. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  14. 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 457
  15. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
  16. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 419
  17. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
  18. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
  19. 2016Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 262
  20. 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 233
  21. 2017Towards Poisoning of Deep Learning Algorithms with Back-gradient Optimizationcited by 188
  22. 2020Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient Matchingcited by 156
  23. 2021Poisoning and Backdooring Contrastive Learningcited by 149
  24. 2020DeltaGrad: Rapid retraining of machine learning modelscited by 143
  25. 2013Hacking Smart Machines with Smarter Ones: How to Extract Meaningful Data from Machine Learning Classifierscited by 128
  26. 2018Stronger Data Poisoning Attacks Break Data Sanitization Defensescited by 125
  27. 2018Stealing Hyperparameters in Machine Learningcited by 115
  28. 2021Adversarial Examples Make Strong Poisonscited by 115
  29. 2020Deep Partition Aggregation: Provable Defense against General Poisoning Attackscited by 112
  30. 2020Certified Robustness to Label-Flipping Attacks via Randomized Smoothingcited by 103
  31. 2020Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 90
  32. 2018Technical Report: When Does Machine Learning FAIL? Generalized Transferability for Evasion and Poisoning Attackscited by 78
  33. 2018Label Sanitization against Label Flipping Poisoning Attackscited by 68
  34. 2020Certified Robustness of Nearest Neighbors against Data Poisoning and Backdoor Attackscited by 58
  35. 2020Certified Robustness of Graph Neural Networks against Adversarial Structural Perturbationcited by 57
  36. 2017Mitigating Evasion Attacks to Deep Neural Networks via Region-based Classificationcited by 56
  37. 2019Certified Robustness for Top-k Predictions against Adversarial Perturbations via Randomized Smoothingcited by 54
  38. 2021Poisoning the Unlabeled Dataset of Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 44

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

4 papers.