mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Controlled Text Generation using T5 based Encoder-Decoder Soft Prompt Tuning and Analysis of the Utility of Generated Text in AI

arXiv 2212.02924 ↗First posted 6 Dec 2022cs.CL cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Controlled text generation is a very important task in the arena of natural language processing due to its promising applications. In order to achieve this task we mainly introduce the novel soft prompt tuning method of using soft prompts at both encoder and decoder levels together in a T5 model and investigate the performance as the behaviour of an additional soft prompt related to the decoder of a T5 model in controlled text generation remained unexplored. Then we also investigate the feasibility of steering the output of this extended soft prompted T5 model at decoder level and finally analyse the utility of generated text to be used in AI related tasks such as training AI models with an interpretability analysis of the classifier trained with synthetic text, as there is a lack of proper analysis of methodologies in generating properly labelled data to be utilized in AI tasks. Through the performed in-depth intrinsic and extrinsic evaluations of this generation model along with the artificially generated data, we found that this model produced better results compared to the T5 model with a single soft prompt at encoder level and the sentiment classifier trained using this artificially generated data can produce comparable classification results to the results of a classifier trained with real labelled data and also the classifier decision is interpretable with respect to the input text content.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2022.

Builds on

17 of 34 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  6. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  7. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  8. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  9. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  10. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
  11. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
  12. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 716
5 more
  1. 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 441
  2. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 376
  3. 2020The Multilingual Amazon Reviews Corpuscited by 143
  4. 2022A Survey of Controllable Text Generation using Transformer-based Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 129
  5. 2022Tailor: A Prompt-Based Approach to Attribute-Based Controlled Text Generationcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

6 papers.