mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CURO: Curriculum Learning for Relative Overgeneralization

arXiv 2212.02733 ↗First posted 6 Dec 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.MAcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Relative overgeneralization (RO) is a pathology that can arise in cooperative multi-agent tasks when the optimal joint action's utility falls below that of a sub-optimal joint action. RO can cause the agents to get stuck into local optima or fail to solve cooperative tasks requiring significant coordination between agents within a given timestep. In this work, we empirically find that, in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), both value-based and policy gradient MARL algorithms can suffer from RO and fail to learn effective coordination policies. To better overcome RO, we propose a novel approach called curriculum learning for relative overgeneralization (CURO). To solve a target task that exhibits strong RO, in CURO, we first fine-tune the reward function of the target task to generate source tasks to train the agent. Then, to effectively transfer the knowledge acquired in one task to the next, we use a transfer learning method that combines value function transfer with buffer transfer, which enables more efficient exploration in the target task. CURO is general and can be applied to both value-based and policy gradient MARL methods. We demonstrate that, when applied to QMIX, HAPPO, and HATRPO, CURO can successfully overcome severe RO, achieve improved performance, and outperform baseline methods in a variety of challenging cooperative multi-agent tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2022.

Builds on

23 of 37 references.

References · 23

  1. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  2. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  3. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  4. 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 659
  5. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  6. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
  7. 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 490
  8. 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 475
  9. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
  10. 2020Curriculum Learning for Reinforcement Learning Domains: A Framework and Surveycited by 350
  11. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
  12. 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
11 more
  1. 2019MAVEN: Multi-Agent Variational Explorationcited by 181
  2. 2021Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
  3. 2020FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy Gradientscited by 178
  4. 2019Deep Coordination Graphscited by 96
  5. 2021Rethinking the Implementation Tricks and Monotonicity Constraint in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
  6. 2021Contrasting Centralized and Decentralized Critics in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 54
  7. 2020Evolutionary Population Curriculum for Scaling Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 47
  8. 2019From Few to More: Large-scale Dynamic Multiagent Curriculum Learningcited by 36
  9. 2020UneVEn: Universal Value Exploration for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
  10. 2018Multiagent Soft Q-Learningcited by 26
  11. 2018Negative Update Intervals in Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.