mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

StyleGAN as a Utility-Preserving Face De-identification Method

arXiv 2212.02611 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2022cs.CV cs.CR cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Face de-identification methods have been proposed to preserve users' privacy by obscuring their faces. These methods, however, can degrade the quality of photos, and they usually do not preserve the utility of faces, i.e., their age, gender, pose, and facial expression. Recently, GANs, such as StyleGAN, have been proposed, which generate realistic, high-quality imaginary faces. In this paper, we investigate the use of StyleGAN in generating de-identified faces through style mixing. We examined this de-identification method for preserving utility and privacy by implementing several face detection, verification, and identification attacks and conducting a user study. The results from our extensive experiments, human evaluation, and comparison with two state-of-the-art methods, i.e., CIAGAN and DeepPrivacy, show that StyleGAN performs on par or better than these methods, preserving users' privacy and images' utility. In particular, the results of the machine learning-based experiments show that StyleGAN0-4 preserves utility better than CIAGAN and DeepPrivacy while preserving privacy at the same level. StyleGAN0-3 preserves utility at the same level while providing more privacy. In this paper, for the first time, we also performed a carefully designed user study to examine both privacy and utility-preserving properties of StyleGAN0-3, 0-4, and 0-5, as well as CIAGAN and DeepPrivacy from the human observers' perspectives. Our statistical tests showed that participants tend to verify and identify StyleGAN0-5 images more easily than DeepPrivacy images. All the methods but StyleGAN0-5 had significantly lower identification rates than CIAGAN. Regarding utility, as expected, StyleGAN0-5 performed significantly better in preserving some attributes. Among all methods, on average, participants believe gender has been preserved the most while naturalness has been preserved the least.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2022.

Builds on

27 of 66 references.

References · 27

  1. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  2. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  3. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  4. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  5. 2017Neural Style Transfer: A Reviewcited by 199
  6. 2020DeepFaceLab: Integrated, flexible and extensible face-swapping frameworkcited by 129
  7. 2019DeepPrivacy: A Generative Adversarial Network for Face Anonymizationcited by 108
  8. 2021LowKey: Leveraging Adversarial Attacks to Protect Social Media Users from Facial Recognitioncited by 92
  9. 2020CIAGAN: Conditional Identity Anonymization Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 88
  10. 2018Learning to Anonymize Faces for Privacy Preserving Action Detectioncited by 63
  11. 2017Natural and Effective Obfuscation by Head Inpaintingcited by 60
  12. 2019AnonymousNet: Natural Face De-Identification with Measurable Privacycited by 50
15 more
  1. 2019Live Face De-Identification in Videocited by 48
  2. 2016Defeating Image Obfuscation with Deep Learningcited by 43
  3. 2018A Hybrid Model for Identity Obfuscation by Face Replacementcited by 43
  4. 2017Adversarial Image Perturbation for Privacy Protection -- A Game Theory Perspectivecited by 38
  5. 2018Learning Privacy Preserving Encodings through Adversarial Trainingcited by 30
  6. 2020Face-Off: Adversarial Face Obfuscationcited by 25
  7. 2020FoggySight: A Scheme for Facial Lookup Privacycited by 12
  8. 2015Naive-Deep Face Recognition: Touching the Limit of LFW Benchmark or Not?cited by 10
  9. 2020InfoScrub: Towards Attribute Privacy by Targeted Obfuscationcited by 10
  10. 2021Fairness Properties of Face Recognition and Obfuscation Systemscited by 9
  11. 2017Face Deidentification with Generative Deep Neural Networkscited by 8
  12. 2021A Systematical Solution for Face De-identificationcited by 8
  13. 2019Robustness Analysis of Face Obscurationcited by 5
  14. 2019A Utility-Preserving GAN for Face Obscurationcited by 5
  15. 2019De-identification without losing facescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.