mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Addressing Distribution Shift at Test Time in Pre-trained Language Models

arXiv 2212.02384 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2022cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

State-of-the-art pre-trained language models (PLMs) outperform other models when applied to the majority of language processing tasks. However, PLMs have been found to degrade in performance under distribution shift, a phenomenon that occurs when data at test-time does not come from the same distribution as the source training set. Equally as challenging is the task of obtaining labels in real-time due to issues like long-labeling feedback loops. The lack of adequate methods that address the aforementioned challenges constitutes the need for approaches that continuously adapt the PLM to a distinct distribution. Unsupervised domain adaptation adapts a source model to an unseen as well as unlabeled target domain. While some techniques such as data augmentation can adapt models in several scenarios, they have only been sparsely studied for addressing the distribution shift problem. In this work, we present an approach (MEMO-CL) that improves the performance of PLMs at test-time under distribution shift. Our approach takes advantage of the latest unsupervised techniques in data augmentation and adaptation to minimize the entropy of the PLM's output distribution. MEMO-CL operates on a batch of augmented samples from a single observation in the test set. The technique introduced is unsupervised, domain-agnostic, easy to implement, and requires no additional data. Our experiments result in a 3% improvement over current test-time adaptation baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2022.

Builds on

22 of 33 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  3. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  4. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  5. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
  6. 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 408
  7. 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
  8. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  9. 2021Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 226
  10. 2018Contextual Augmentation: Data Augmentation by Words with Paradigmatic Relationscited by 201
  11. 2021A Fine-Grained Analysis on Distribution Shiftcited by 171
  12. 2020Data Augmentation using Pre-trained Transformer Modelscited by 168
10 more
  1. 2020Better Aggregation in Test-Time Augmentationcited by 121
  2. 2021Lifelong Pretraining: Continually Adapting Language Models to Emerging Corporacited by 114
  3. 2022Continual Pre-Training Mitigates Forgetting in Language and Visioncited by 82
  4. 2022A Broad Study of Pre-training for Domain Generalization and Adaptationcited by 64
  5. 2022Debiased Self-Training for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 62
  6. 2020Greedy Policy Search: A Simple Baseline for Learnable Test-Time Augmentationcited by 61
  7. 2020Unsupervised Paraphrasing with Pretrained Language Modelscited by 15
  8. 2022Improved Text Classification via Test-Time Augmentationcited by 6
  9. 2022Con2DA: Simplifying Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation by Learning Consistent and Contrastive Feature Representationscited by 3
  10. 2022Continual Learning with Deep Learning Methods in an Application-Oriented Contextcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1.

4 papers.