mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Progressive Feature Upgrade in Semi-supervised Learning on Tabular Domain

arXiv 2212.00892 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2022cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent semi-supervised and self-supervised methods have shown great success in the image and text domain by utilizing augmentation techniques. Despite such success, it is not easy to transfer this success to tabular domains. It is not easy to adapt domain-specific transformations from image and language to tabular data due to mixing of different data types (continuous data and categorical data) in the tabular domain. There are a few semi-supervised works on the tabular domain that have focused on proposing new augmentation techniques for tabular data. These approaches may have shown some improvement on datasets with low-cardinality in categorical data. However, the fundamental challenges have not been tackled. The proposed methods either do not apply to datasets with high-cardinality or do not use an efficient encoding of categorical data. We propose using conditional probability representation and an efficient progressively feature upgrading framework to effectively learn representations for tabular data in semi-supervised applications. The extensive experiments show superior performance of the proposed framework and the potential application in semi-supervised settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2022.

Builds on

22 of 39 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  3. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  4. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  5. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  6. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
  7. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 507
  8. 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
  9. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 432
  10. 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 395
  11. 2021In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 301
  12. 2019Label Propagation for Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 287
10 more
  1. 2019Interpolation Consistency Training for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 248
  2. 2021SubTab: Subsetting Features of Tabular Data for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 101
  3. 2017Smooth Neighbors on Teacher Graphs for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 48
  4. 2019A Closer Look At Feature Space Data Augmentation For Few-Shot Intent Classificationcited by 45
  5. 2018Similarity encoding for learning with dirty categorical variablescited by 28
  6. 2019Encoding high-cardinality string categorical variablescited by 22
  7. 2021Contrastive Mixup: Self- and Semi-Supervised learning for Tabular Domaincited by 20
  8. 2020TURL: Table Understanding through Representation Learningcited by 14
  9. 2019Encoding Categorical Variables with Conjugate Bayesian Models for WeWork Lead Scoring Enginecited by 5
  10. 2021Semi-supervised Long-tailed Recognition using Alternate Samplingcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.