mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Split-PU: Hardness-aware Training Strategy for Positive-Unlabeled Learning

arXiv 2211.16756 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2022cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning aims to learn a model with rare positive samples and abundant unlabeled samples. Compared with classical binary classification, the task of PU learning is much more challenging due to the existence of many incompletely-annotated data instances. Since only part of the most confident positive samples are available and evidence is not enough to categorize the rest samples, many of these unlabeled data may also be the positive samples. Research on this topic is particularly useful and essential to many real-world tasks which demand very expensive labelling cost. For example, the recognition tasks in disease diagnosis, recommendation system and satellite image recognition may only have few positive samples that can be annotated by the experts. These methods mainly omit the intrinsic hardness of some unlabeled data, which can result in sub-optimal performance as a consequence of fitting the easy noisy data and not sufficiently utilizing the hard data. In this paper, we focus on improving the commonly-used nnPU with a novel training pipeline. We highlight the intrinsic difference of hardness of samples in the dataset and the proper learning strategies for easy and hard data. By considering this fact, we propose first splitting the unlabeled dataset with an early-stop strategy. The samples that have inconsistent predictions between the temporary and base model are considered as hard samples. Then the model utilizes a noise-tolerant Jensen-Shannon divergence loss for easy data; and a dual-source consistency regularization for hard data which includes a cross-consistency between student and base model for low-level features and self-consistency for high-level features and predictions, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2022.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  4. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  5. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  6. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  7. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  8. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  9. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  10. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  11. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  12. 2019Interpolation Consistency Training for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 248
13 more
  1. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
  2. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
  3. 2015Webly Supervised Learning of Convolutional Networkscited by 95
  4. 2017Toward Robustness against Label Noise in Training Deep Discriminative Neural Networkscited by 78
  5. 2021Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence Loss for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 74
  6. 2020Self-PU: Self Boosted and Calibrated Positive-Unlabeled Trainingcited by 47
  7. 2020Coherent Gradients: An Approach to Understanding Generalization in Gradient Descent-based Optimizationcited by 41
  8. 2018Classification from Positive, Unlabeled and Biased Negative Datacited by 34
  9. 2016Deep Saliency with Encoded Low level Distance Map and High Level Featurescited by 23
  10. 2022Scalable Penalized Regression for Noise Detection in Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 15
  11. 2019Revisiting Sample Selection Approach to Positive-Unlabeled Learning: Turning Unlabeled Data into Positive rather than Negativecited by 6
  12. 2022Uncertainty-aware Pseudo-label Selection for Positive-Unlabeled Learningcited by 3
  13. 2019A Variational Approach for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Applications of Positive Unlabeled (PU) and Negative Unlabeled (NU) Learning in Cybersecurity
  2. 2026Unification and Optimization of Robust Supervised Learning
  3. 2024PUMA: margin-based data pruning
  4. 2023UniChest: Conquer-and-Divide Pre-training for Multi-Source Chest X-Ray Classification
  5. 2025Positive-Unlabeled Diffusion Models for Preventing Sensitive Data Generation
  6. 2025Unsupervised Learning for Class Distribution Mismatch
  7. 2023Vision-Language Pseudo-Labels for Single-Positive Multi-Label Learning
  8. 2025Unlabeled Data vs. Pre-trained Knowledge: Rethinking SSL in the Era of Large Models