Data Poisoning Attack Aiming the Vulnerability of Continual Learning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Backdoor and data poisoning attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
Generally, regularization-based continual learning models limit access to the previous task data to imitate the real-world constraints related to memory and privacy. However, this introduces a problem in these models by not being able to track the performance on each task. In essence, current continual learning methods are susceptible to attacks on previous tasks. We demonstrate the vulnerability of regularization-based continual learning methods by presenting a simple task-specific data poisoning attack that can be used in the learning process of a new task. Training data generated by the proposed attack causes performance degradation on a specific task targeted by the attacker. We experiment with the attack on the two representative regularization-based continual learning methods, Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC) and Synaptic Intelligence (SI), trained with variants of MNIST dataset. The experiment results justify the vulnerability proposed in this paper and demonstrate the importance of developing continual learning models that are robust to adversarial attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2022.
Builds on
14 of 20 references.
References · 14
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
- 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,332
- 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 882
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
- 2018Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the taskcited by 672
- 2017PathNet: Evolution Channels Gradient Descent in Super Neural Networkscited by 362
2 more
- 2018Reinforced Continual Learningcited by 186
- 2019Learning to Confuse: Generating Training Time Adversarial Data with Auto-Encodercited by 70
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024Persistent Backdoor Attacks in Continual Learningcited by 11
- 2023BrainWash: A Poisoning Attack to Forget in Continual Learningcited by 9
- 2025Addressing The Devastating Effects Of Single-Task Data Poisoning In Exemplar-Free Continual Learningcited by 0
- 2025On the Occurence of Critical Learning Periods in Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Amnesia: A Stealthy Replay Attack on Continual Learning Dreamscited by 0
- 2026Theory of Continual Learning Against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 0
- 2026Theory of Continual Learning Against Data Poisoning Attacks29 Jun 2026
- 2026Amnesia: A Stealthy Replay Attack on Continual Learning Dreams10 Jun 2026
- 2025On the Occurence of Critical Learning Periods in Neural Networks9 Oct 2025
- 2025Addressing The Devastating Effects Of Single-Task Data Poisoning In Exemplar-Free Continual Learning5 Jul 2025
- 2024Persistent Backdoor Attacks in Continual Learning20 Sep 2024
- 2023BrainWash: A Poisoning Attack to Forget in Continual Learning20 Nov 2023