mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Don't Watch Me: A Spatio-Temporal Trojan Attack on Deep-Reinforcement-Learning-Augment Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2211.14440 ↗First posted 22 Nov 2022cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is one of the most popular algorithms to realize an autonomous driving (AD) system. The key success factor of DRL is that it embraces the perception capability of deep neural networks which, however, have been proven vulnerable to Trojan attacks. Trojan attacks have been widely explored in supervised learning (SL) tasks (e.g., image classification), but rarely in sequential decision-making tasks solved by DRL. Hence, in this paper, we explore Trojan attacks on DRL for AD tasks. First, we propose a spatio-temporal DRL algorithm based on the recurrent neural network and attention mechanism to prove that capturing spatio-temporal traffic features is the key factor to the effectiveness and safety of a DRL-augment AD system. We then design a spatial-temporal Trojan attack on DRL policies, where the trigger is hidden in a sequence of spatial and temporal traffic features, rather than a single instant state used in existing Trojan on SL and DRL tasks. With our Trojan, the adversary acts as a surrounding normal vehicle and can trigger attacks via specific spatial-temporal driving behaviors, rather than physical or wireless access. Through extensive experiments, we show that while capturing spatio-temporal traffic features can improve the performance of DRL for different AD tasks, they suffer from Trojan attacks since our designed Trojan shows high stealthy (various spatio-temporal trigger patterns), effective (less than 3.1% performance variance rate and more than 98.5% attack success rate), and sustainable to existing advanced defenses.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 23 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2022.

Builds on

23 of 48 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
  2. 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 457
  3. 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 457
  4. 2019STRIP: A Defence Against Trojan Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 437
  5. 2018Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks by Activation Clusteringcited by 429
  6. 2020Backdoor Learning: A Surveycited by 412
  7. 2017Socially Aware Motion Planning with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 128
  8. 2018Deep Variational Reinforcement Learning for POMDPscited by 122
  9. 2020Backdoor Attacks and Countermeasures on Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 120
  10. 2021Recurrent Model-Free RL Can Be a Strong Baseline for Many POMDPscited by 115
  11. 2020Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Motion Planning of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 101
  12. 2020Deep Feature Space Trojan Attack of Neural Networks by Controlled Detoxificationcited by 93
11 more
  1. 2021BACKDOORL: Backdoor Attack against Competitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 66
  2. 2020Do RNN and LSTM have Long Memory?cited by 47
  3. 2019Social Attention for Autonomous Decision-Making in Dense Trafficcited by 39
  4. 2020Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving with Latent State Inference and Spatial-Temporal Relationshipscited by 36
  5. 2020Stop-and-Go: Exploring Backdoor Attacks on Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Traffic Congestion Control Systemscited by 35
  6. 2015Deep Attention Recurrent Q-Networkcited by 27
  7. 2019Design of intentional backdoors in sequential modelscited by 20
  8. 2021Poisoning Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents with In-Distribution Triggerscited by 19
  9. 2022A Temporal-Pattern Backdoor Attack to Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  10. 2013POMDPs Make Better Hackers: Accounting for Uncertainty in Penetration Testingcited by 14
  11. 2019Autonomous Driving using Safe Reinforcement Learning by Incorporating a Regret-based Human Lane-Changing Decision Modelcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Targeted Attack on Deep RL-based Autonomous Driving with Learned Visual Patterns
  2. 2024Less is More: A Stealthy and Efficient Adversarial Attack Method for DRL-based Autonomous Driving Policies
  3. 2025Sharpening the Spear: Adaptive Expert-Guided Adversarial Attack Against DRL-based Autonomous Driving Policies
  4. 2021A Survey of Deep RL and IL for Autonomous Driving Policy Learning
  5. 2026AD2: Analysis and Detection of Adversarial Threats in Visual Perception for End-to-End Autonomous Driving Systems
  6. 2022Self-Awareness Safety of Deep Reinforcement Learning in Road Traffic Junction Driving
  7. 2025Robust Driving Control for Autonomous Vehicles: An Intelligent General-sum Constrained Adversarial Reinforcement Learning Approach
  8. 2025TrojanTO: Action-Level Backdoor Attacks against Trajectory Optimization Models