mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Schr"odinger's Bat: Diffusion Models Sometimes Generate Polysemous Words in Superposition

arXiv 2211.13095 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2022cs.CLcited by 8

On the map: Diffusion models → Image generation, text-to-image and editing

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work has shown that despite their impressive capabilities, text-to-image diffusion models such as DALL-E 2 (Ramesh et al., 2022) can display strange behaviours when a prompt contains a word with multiple possible meanings, often generating images containing both senses of the word (Rassin et al., 2022). In this work we seek to put forward a possible explanation of this phenomenon. Using the similar Stable Diffusion model (Rombach et al., 2022), we first show that when given an input that is the sum of encodings of two distinct words, the model can produce an image containing both concepts represented in the sum. We then demonstrate that the CLIP encoder used to encode prompts (Radford et al., 2021) encodes polysemous words as a superposition of meanings, and that using linear algebraic techniques we can edit these representations to influence the senses represented in the generated images. Combining these two findings, we suggest that the homonym duplication phenomenon described by Rassin et al. (2022) is caused by diffusion models producing images representing both of the meanings that are present in superposition in the encoding of a polysemous word.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Image generation, text-to-image and editing, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 9 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2022.

Builds on

9 of 14 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents13 Apr

Other references · 8

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  4. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  5. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  6. 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
  7. 2022DALLE-2 is Seeing Double: Flaws in Word-to-Concept Mapping in Text2Image Modelscited by 50
  8. 2020How to marry a star: probabilistic constraints for meaning in contextcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023The Hidden Language of Diffusion Models
  2. 2024Investigating Conceptual Blending of a Diffusion Model for Improving Nonword-to-Image Generation
  3. 2023Memory Triggers: Unveiling Memorization in Text-To-Image Generative Models through Word-Level Duplication
  4. 2024Magnet: We Never Know How Text-to-Image Diffusion Models Work, Until We Learn How Vision-Language Models Function
  5. 2025Emergence and Evolution of Interpretable Concepts in Diffusion Models
  6. 2024How to Blend Concepts in Diffusion Models
  7. 2023Diffusion Explainer: Visual Explanation for Text-to-image Stable Diffusion
  8. 2024Words Worth a Thousand Pictures: Measuring and Understanding Perceptual Variability in Text-to-Image Generation