mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Greedy based Value Representation for Optimal Coordination in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2211.12075 ↗First posted 22 Nov 2022cs.MA cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to the representation limitation of the joint Q value function, multi-agent reinforcement learning methods with linear value decomposition (LVD) or monotonic value decomposition (MVD) suffer from relative overgeneralization. As a result, they can not ensure optimal consistency (i.e., the correspondence between individual greedy actions and the maximal true Q value). In this paper, we derive the expression of the joint Q value function of LVD and MVD. According to the expression, we draw a transition diagram, where each self-transition node (STN) is a possible convergence. To ensure optimal consistency, the optimal node is required to be the unique STN. Therefore, we propose the greedy-based value representation (GVR), which turns the optimal node into an STN via inferior target shaping and further eliminates the non-optimal STNs via superior experience replay. In addition, GVR achieves an adaptive trade-off between optimality and stability. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in experiments on various benchmarks. Theoretical proofs and empirical results on matrix games demonstrate that GVR ensures optimal consistency under sufficient exploration.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2022.

Builds on

18 of 25 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  2. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
  3. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  4. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  5. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  6. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
  7. 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 490
  8. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
  9. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
  10. 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
  11. 2019MAVEN: Multi-Agent Variational Explorationcited by 181
  12. 2017A Deeper Look at Experience Replaycited by 104
6 more
  1. 2019Deep Coordination Graphscited by 96
  2. 2020Qatten: A General Framework for Cooperative Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
  3. 2020UneVEn: Universal Value Exploration for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
  4. 2018Multiagent Soft Q-Learningcited by 26
  5. 2020Q-value Path Decomposition for Deep Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
  6. 2019SMIX(λ): Enhancing Centralized Value Functions for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

4 papers.