mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Edge Computing Devices for Grape Bunches and Trunks Detection using Accelerated Object Detection Single Shot MultiBox Deep Learning Models

arXiv 2211.11647 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2022cs.CV cs.AR cs.DCcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: Visual perception enables robots to perceive the environment. Visual data is processed using computer vision algorithms that are usually time-expensive and require powerful devices to process the visual data in real-time, which is unfeasible for open-field robots with limited energy. This work benchmarks the performance of different heterogeneous platforms for object detection in real-time. This research benchmarks three architectures: embedded GPU -- Graphical Processing Units (such as NVIDIA Jetson Nano 2 GB and 4 GB, and NVIDIA Jetson TX2), TPU -- Tensor Processing Unit (such as Coral Dev Board TPU), and DPU -- Deep Learning Processor Unit (such as in AMD-Xilinx ZCU104 Development Board, and AMD-Xilinx Kria KV260 Starter Kit). Method: The authors used the RetinaNet ResNet-50 fine-tuned using the natural VineSet dataset. After the trained model was converted and compiled for target-specific hardware formats to improve the execution efficiency. Conclusions and Results: The platforms were assessed in terms of performance of the evaluation metrics and efficiency (time of inference). Graphical Processing Units (GPUs) were the slowest devices, running at 3 FPS to 5 FPS, and Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) were the fastest devices, running at 14 FPS to 25 FPS. The efficiency of the Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) is irrelevant and similar to NVIDIA Jetson TX2. TPU and GPU are the most power-efficient, consuming about 5W. The performance differences, in the evaluation metrics, across devices are irrelevant and have an F1 of about 70 % and mean Average Precision (mAP) of about 60 %.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2022.

Builds on

15 of 43 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  3. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
  4. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  5. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  6. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  7. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,130
  8. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
  9. 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 699
  10. 2019YOLACT: Real-time Instance Segmentationcited by 443
  11. 2014Compressing Deep Convolutional Networks using Vector Quantizationcited by 195
  12. 2019Quantization Networkscited by 153
3 more
  1. 2021Evaluating the Single-Shot MultiBox Detector and YOLO Deep Learning Models for the Detection of Tomatoes in a Greenhousecited by 6
  2. 2017fpgaConvNet: A Toolflow for Mapping Diverse Convolutional Neural Networks on Embedded FPGAscited by 5
  3. 2022End-to-end deep learning for directly estimating grape yield from ground-based imagerycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

6 papers.