Do graph neural networks learn traditional jet substructure?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
At the CERN LHC, the task of jet tagging, whose goal is to infer the origin of a jet given a set of final-state particles, is dominated by machine learning methods. Graph neural networks have been used to address this task by treating jets as point clouds with underlying, learnable, edge connections between the particles inside. We explore the decision-making process for one such state-of-the-art network, ParticleNet, by looking for relevant edge connections identified using the layerwise-relevance propagation technique. As the model is trained, we observe changes in the distribution of relevant edges connecting different intermediate clusters of particles, known as subjets. The resulting distribution of subjet connections is different for signal jets originating from top quarks, whose subjets typically correspond to its three decay products, and background jets originating from lighter quarks and gluons. This behavior indicates that the model is using traditional jet substructure observables, such as the number of prongs -- energetic particle clusters -- within a jet, when identifying jets.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2022.
Builds on
16 of 47 references.
References · 16
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
- 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,223
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2020Higher-Order Explanations of Graph Neural Networks via Relevant Walkscited by 138
- 2018Fast inference of deep neural networks in FPGAs for particle physicscited by 133
- 2019ParticleNet: Jet Tagging via Particle Cloudscited by 64
- 2021Particle Cloud Generation with Message Passing Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 46
- 2019Learning representations of irregular particle-detector geometry with distance-weighted graph networkscited by 43
- 2021MLPF: Efficient machine-learned particle-flow reconstruction using graph neural networkscited by 36
- 2021Applications and Techniques for Fast Machine Learning in Sciencecited by 32
- 2020Object condensation: one-stage grid-free multi-object reconstruction in physics detectors, graph and image datacited by 24
- 2022Attribution-based Explanations that Provide Recourse Cannot be Robustcited by 20
4 more
- 2020Explainable AI for ML jet taggers using expert variables and layerwise relevance propagationcited by 14
- 2022Machine Learning for Particle Flow Reconstruction at CMScited by 14
- 2021Explaining machine-learned particle-flow reconstructioncited by 12
- 2022Explainable AI for High Energy Physicscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023A Comparison Between Invariant and Equivariant Classical and Quantum Graph Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2024Jet Discrimination with Quantum Complete Graph Neural Networkcited by 3
- 2024Automated Molecular Concept Generation and Labeling with Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026Dissecting Jet-Tagger Through Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 0
- 2026Dissecting Jet-Tagger Through Mechanistic Interpretability11 May 2026
- 2024Automated Molecular Concept Generation and Labeling with Large Language Models13 Jun 2024
- 2024Jet Discrimination with Quantum Complete Graph Neural Network8 Mar 2024
- 2023A Comparison Between Invariant and Equivariant Classical and Quantum Graph Neural Networks30 Nov 2023