Reducing Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translation with Feature Attribution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural conditional language generation models achieve the state-of-the-art in Neural Machine Translation (NMT) but are highly dependent on the quality of parallel training dataset. When trained on low-quality datasets, these models are prone to various error types, including hallucinations, i.e. outputs that are fluent, but unrelated to the source sentences. These errors are particularly dangerous, because on the surface the translation can be perceived as a correct output, especially if the reader does not understand the source language. We present a case study focusing on model understanding and regularisation to reduce hallucinations in NMT. We first use feature attribution methods to study the behaviour of an NMT model that produces hallucinations. We then leverage these methods to propose a novel loss function that substantially helps reduce hallucinations and does not require retraining the model from scratch.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2022.
Builds on
11 of 24 references.
References · 11
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 489
- 2021The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 161
- 2016Modeling Coverage for Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
- 2020Restricting the Flow: Information Bottlenecks for Attributioncited by 110
- 2019Jointly Learning to Align and Translate with Transformer Modelscited by 75
- 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
- 2019Domain Robustness in Neural Machine Translationcited by 64
- 2020MLQE-PE: A Multilingual Quality Estimation and Post-Editing Datasetcited by 47
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Modelscited by 78
- 2023Leveraging GPT-4 for Automatic Translation Post-Editingcited by 56
- 2022Optimal Transport for Unsupervised Hallucination Detection in Neural Machine Translationcited by 13
- 2023Quantifying the Plausibility of Context Reliance in Neural Machine Translationcited by 6
- 2025Hallucinations in Code Change to Natural Language Generation: Prevalence and Evaluation of Detection Metricscited by 4
- 2025Hallucinations in Code Change to Natural Language Generation: Prevalence and Evaluation of Detection Metrics12 Aug 2025
- 2023Quantifying the Plausibility of Context Reliance in Neural Machine Translation2 Oct 2023
- 2023Leveraging GPT-4 for Automatic Translation Post-Editing24 May 2023
- 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Models27 Feb 2023
- 2022Optimal Transport for Unsupervised Hallucination Detection in Neural Machine Translation19 Dec 2022