ED-FAITH: Evaluating Dialogue Summarization on Faithfulness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Abstractive summarization models typically generate content unfaithful to the input, thus highlighting the significance of evaluating the faithfulness of generated summaries. Most faithfulness metrics are only evaluated on news domain, can they be transferred to other summarization tasks? In this work, we first present a systematic study of faithfulness metrics for dialogue summarization. We evaluate common faithfulness metrics on dialogue datasets and observe that most metrics correlate poorly with human judgements despite performing well on news datasets. Given these findings, to improve existing metrics' performance on dialogue summarization, we first finetune on in-domain dataset, then apply unlikelihood training on negative samples, and show that they can successfully improve metric performance on dialogue data. Inspired by the strong zero-shot performance of the T0 language model, we further propose T0-Score -- a new metric for faithfulness evaluation, which shows consistent improvement against baseline metrics across multiple domains.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2022.
Builds on
25 of 32 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
- 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
- 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,100
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
- 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 809
- 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
- 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
13 more
- 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 578
- 2019SAMSum Corpus: A Human-annotated Dialogue Dataset for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 530
- 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 489
- 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 376
- 2020FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 292
- 2020The Pushshift Reddit Datasetcited by 289
- 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 285
- 2021DialogSum: A Real-Life Scenario Dialogue Summarization Datasetcited by 181
- 2021CLIFF: Contrastive Learning for Improving Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 120
- 2020GO FIGURE: A Meta Evaluation of Factuality in Summarizationcited by 75
- 2021Compression, Transduction, and Creation: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Natural Language Generationcited by 60
- 2021CONFIT: Toward Faithful Dialogue Summarization with Linguistically-Informed Contrastive Fine-tuningcited by 44
- 2021ConvoSumm: Conversation Summarization Benchmark and Improved Abstractive Summarization with Argument Miningcited by 37
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.