mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Visually Grounded VQA by Lattice-based Retrieval

arXiv 2211.08086 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual Grounding (VG) in Visual Question Answering (VQA) systems describes how well a system manages to tie a question and its answer to relevant image regions. Systems with strong VG are considered intuitively interpretable and suggest an improved scene understanding. While VQA accuracy performances have seen impressive gains over the past few years, explicit improvements to VG performance and evaluation thereof have often taken a back seat on the road to overall accuracy improvements. A cause of this originates in the predominant choice of learning paradigm for VQA systems, which consists of training a discriminative classifier over a predetermined set of answer options. In this work, we break with the dominant VQA modeling paradigm of classification and investigate VQA from the standpoint of an information retrieval task. As such, the developed system directly ties VG into its core search procedure. Our system operates over a weighted, directed, acyclic graph, a.k.a. "lattice", which is derived from the scene graph of a given image in conjunction with region-referring expressions extracted from the question. We give a detailed analysis of our approach and discuss its distinctive properties and limitations. Our approach achieves the strongest VG performance among examined systems and exhibits exceptional generalization capabilities in a number of scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2022.

Builds on

36 of 51 references.

References · 36

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  4. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  5. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  6. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  7. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  8. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  9. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  10. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
  11. 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,054
  12. 2017Dynamic Routing Between Capsulescited by 689
24 more
  1. 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 337
  2. 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
  3. 2015Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answeringcited by 273
  4. 2018Compositional Attention Networks for Machine Reasoningcited by 183
  5. 2017Inferring and Executing Programs for Visual Reasoningcited by 130
  6. 2019Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Groundedcited by 127
  7. 2017Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 125
  8. 2019Relation-Aware Graph Attention Network for Visual Question Answeringcited by 119
  9. 2019Learning by Abstraction: The Neural State Machinecited by 113
  10. 2016Modeling Coverage for Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
  11. 2018Explainable and Explicit Visual Reasoning over Scene Graphscited by 103
  12. 2020Roses Are Red, Violets Are Blue... but Should Vqa Expect Them To?cited by 69
  13. 2020MUTANT: A Training Paradigm for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Visual Question Answeringcited by 63
  14. 2019Self-Critical Reasoning for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 61
  15. 2019Language-Conditioned Graph Networks for Relational Reasoningcited by 55
  16. 2018Explainable Neural Computation via Stack Neural Module Networkscited by 54
  17. 2018Transparency by Design: Closing the Gap Between Performance and Interpretability in Visual Reasoningcited by 51
  18. 2019Meta Module Network for Compositional Visual Reasoningcited by 39
  19. 2020Neuro-Symbolic Visual Reasoning: Disentangling "Visual" from "Reasoning"cited by 35
  20. 2021Found a Reason for me? Weakly-supervised Grounded Visual Question Answering using Capsulescited by 22
  21. 2021ProTo: Program-Guided Transformer for Program-Guided Taskscited by 19
  22. 2020Visual Grounding Methods for VQA are Working for the Wrong Reasons!cited by 18
  23. 2021GraghVQA: Language-Guided Graph Neural Networks for Graph-based Visual Question Answeringcited by 16
  24. 2022VisFIS: Visual Feature Importance Supervision with Right-for-the-Right-Reason Objectivescited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.