Can neural networks extrapolate? Discussion of a theorem by Pedro Domingos
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks trained on large datasets by minimizing a loss have become the state-of-the-art approach for resolving data science problems, particularly in computer vision, image processing and natural language processing. In spite of their striking results, our theoretical understanding about how neural networks operate is limited. In particular, what are the interpolation capabilities of trained neural networks? In this paper we discuss a theorem of Domingos stating that "every machine learned by continuous gradient descent is approximately a kernel machine". According to Domingos, this fact leads to conclude that all machines trained on data are mere kernel machines. We first extend Domingo's result in the discrete case and to networks with vector-valued output. We then study its relevance and significance on simple examples. We find that in simple cases, the "neural tangent kernel" arising in Domingos' theorem does provide understanding of the networks' predictions. Furthermore, when the task given to the network grows in complexity, the interpolation capability of the network can be effectively explained by Domingos' theorem, and therefore is limited. We illustrate this fact on a classic perception theory problem: recovering a shape from its boundary.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2022.
Builds on
11 of 27 references.
References · 11
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
- 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 763
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
- 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 591
- 2019Lookahead Optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step backcited by 333
- 2021Input Similarity from the Neural Network Perspectivecited by 78
- 2020Every Model Learned by Gradient Descent Is Approximately a Kernel Machinecited by 53
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023Plasma Surrogate Modelling using Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 29
- 2024Scale generalisation properties of extended scale-covariant and scale-invariant Gaussian derivative networks on image datasets with spatial scaling variationscited by 3
- 2025Just One Layer Norm Guarantees Stable Extrapolationcited by 2
- 2026On Interpolation Formulas Describing Neural Network Generalizationcited by 1
- 2025Modeling Membrane Degradation in PEM Electrolyzers with Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Scale-invariant Gaussian derivative residual networkscited by 0
- 2026On Interpolation Formulas Describing Neural Network Generalization14 Mar 2026
- 2026Scale-invariant Gaussian derivative residual networks3 Mar 2026
- 2025Modeling Membrane Degradation in PEM Electrolyzers with Physics-Informed Neural Networks19 Jun 2025
- 2025Just One Layer Norm Guarantees Stable Extrapolation20 May 2025
- 2024Scale generalisation properties of extended scale-covariant and scale-invariant Gaussian derivative networks on image datasets with spatial scaling variations17 Sep 2024
- 2023Plasma Surrogate Modelling using Fourier Neural Operators10 Nov 2023